From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7FF2F5498; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761118477; cv=none; b=OR6xPE+w8kLmB5mTI6nQvuMXQ+kP/Igz42BboBLUIILi45n0XnT03o8VzULIe8Y0Pz9eAtLXGLWG+nEn3kVcHwSc9mg/hFRLD6zddvC/A6/QX/97Nh5VlLcooStk0qBatBSF1U0y1I33Fup+gCoO3HFie4y6ikUbjG5nAXGTj/g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761118477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eyXJCFDsCkhpZlgqjwhIIX+LFXlOaWVeUNNQR0t27/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KEs7j8U07S3kDeuAhgwDMMZRwQsYVc68KAUFWjaJtBBb83zDHHkdcTno0BiYxpnhU9oJor6iZZzR16XT663oAPHWwdiUey3AnRcm+tOPYmOWxA/3LhrhQ0Ajz2HCQHp1kffFUDnxAkTfP8GYIySfjHULUQoomxG6KxF8IPMeENI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 62C1C227A8E; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 09:34:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 09:34:29 +0200 From: hch To: Zorro Lang Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Johannes Thumshirn , hch , Naohiro Aota , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Hans Holmberg , "fstests@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , Carlos Maiolino , Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] generic: basic smoke for filesystems on zoned block devices Message-ID: <20251022073429.GA7845@lst.de> References: <20251016152032.654284-1-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> <20251016152032.654284-4-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> <20251017185633.pvpapg5gq47s2vmm@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <0d05cde5-024b-4136-ad51-9a56361f4b51@wdc.com> <20251018140518.2xlpmmqajgaeg7xq@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> <8253d6b9-e98b-4a05-80c0-f255ec32ee38@wdc.com> <16e539fe-b9f0-4645-b135-3930df249eab@wdc.com> <20251021144920.GH3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20251022072442.lnu5d7chvtqn6zuj@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251022072442.lnu5d7chvtqn6zuj@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 03:24:42PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > As this's a generic test case, so there're 2 questions from me: > 1) Can all FSTYPs (on SCRATCH_MNT) be the underlying fs of a zloop device? Yes. > 2) Can all FSTYPs works on zloop device? No. > If the 1st question is "yes", but looks like the `_try_mkfs_dev $zloop` restricts the > FSTYP from being un-localfs (e.g. nfs, cifs, afs, overlay etc:) Yes, we had this come up before, this test should be limited to block based file system. I.e. probably a _require_block_device on $SCRATCH_DEV even if that's not strictly speaking the exactly correct check.