From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1D81E2307 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763554615; cv=none; b=BUc6DaBkH4bleN3wU8m5Kktghxz4k+dFE0OSB0+NWM3Y0nomMzoj/tvvbNKeToljRg6I3zuO5IPUwTnrpHDJl+Eb8tCTzAu+XrRVdTDQ7JJnY3cbAXMN2j3Gm61hXUzQCFkjyHcetKT8/2oNN/NxwtMY9Wu6SBWY0/TY0K8T3Sc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763554615; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AO+9l1AlaexgLTVb+lmn2OO97YReHnCxT8p3+Jylrvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Kbf75QP6RDEDRru8rYAmnAPuVpGHRwUkklzqd7T7BpCqj8qJJuZj67gDAQdYzEIv6vK7Fq1rTmv67+4YoNjrwSGoCgKA2NxBUXMS5vAcLPjkfFWgQYX0Nj3lZm4QmKSG59acAQrz7cFNFoDLsHa4xgBVSdn1NrzARWY8b7O5+fw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60A720413; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B83B3EA61; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id bBLmIS61HWkxcwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:16:46 +0000 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:16:45 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Daniel Vacek Cc: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] btrfs: add fscrypt support, PART 1 Message-ID: <20251119121645.GF13846@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz References: <20251118160845.3006733-1-neelx@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251118160845.3006733-1-neelx@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spam-Level: X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A60A720413 X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.00 On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:08:37PM +0100, Daniel Vacek wrote: > This is a revive of former work [1] of Omar, Sweet Tea and Josef to bring > native encryption support to btrfs. > > It will come in more parts. The first part this time is splitting the simple > and isolated stuff out first to reduce the size of the final patchset. > > Changes: > * v8 - Clean my mistakenly added Signed-off-by: > * v7 - Drop the checksum patch for now. It will make more sense later. > - Drop the btrfs/330 fix. It seems no longer needed after the years. > * v6 vs v5 [1] is mostly rebase to the latest for-next and cleaning up the > conflicts. > > The remaining part needs further cleanup and a bit of redesign and it will > follow later. Thanks, I've added it to for-next with the following note: Note: The patch was taken from v5 of fscrypt patchset (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1706116485.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/) which was handled over time by various people: Omar Sandoval, Sweet Tea Dorminy, Josef Bacik. And added your signed-off as you're submitting it.