From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
clm@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.10] btrfs: scrub: always update btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 09:02:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251206140252.645973-7-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251206140252.645973-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ Upstream commit 54df8b80cc63aa0f22c4590cad11542731ed43ff ]
[BUG]
When a scrub failed immediately without any byte scrubbed, the returned
btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical will always be 0, even if there is a
non-zero @start passed into btrfs_scrub_dev() for resume cases.
This will reset the progress and make later scrub resume start from the
beginning.
[CAUSE]
The function btrfs_scrub_dev() accepts a @progress parameter to copy its
updated progress to the caller, there are cases where we either don't
touch progress::last_physical at all or copy 0 into last_physical:
- last_physical not updated at all
If some error happened before scrubbing any super block or chunk, we
will not copy the progress, leaving the @last_physical untouched.
E.g. failed to allocate @sctx, scrubbing a missing device or even
there is already a running scrub and so on.
All those cases won't touch @progress at all, resulting the
last_physical untouched and will be left as 0 for most cases.
- Error out before scrubbing any bytes
In those case we allocated @sctx, and sctx->stat.last_physical is all
zero (initialized by kvzalloc()).
Unfortunately some critical errors happened during
scrub_enumerate_chunks() or scrub_supers() before any stripe is really
scrubbed.
In that case although we will copy sctx->stat back to @progress, since
no byte is really scrubbed, last_physical will be overwritten to 0.
[FIX]
Make sure the parameter @progress always has its @last_physical member
updated to @start parameter inside btrfs_scrub_dev().
At the very beginning of the function, set @progress->last_physical to
@start, so that even if we error out without doing progress copying,
last_physical is still at @start.
Then after we got @sctx allocated, set sctx->stat.last_physical to
@start, this will make sure even if we didn't get any byte scrubbed, at
the progress copying stage the @last_physical is not left as zero.
This should resolve the resume progress reset problem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index ba20d9286a340..cff67ed630196 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3039,6 +3039,10 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
unsigned int nofs_flag;
bool need_commit = false;
+ /* Set the basic fallback @last_physical before we got a sctx. */
+ if (progress)
+ progress->last_physical = start;
+
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -3057,6 +3061,7 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
sctx = scrub_setup_ctx(fs_info, is_dev_replace);
if (IS_ERR(sctx))
return PTR_ERR(sctx);
+ sctx->stat.last_physical = start;
ret = scrub_workers_get(fs_info);
if (ret)
--
2.51.0
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-06 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20251206140252.645973-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-12-06 14:02 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
[not found] <20251209001610.611575-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-12-09 0:15 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.10] btrfs: scrub: always update btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251206140252.645973-7-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox