public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	clm@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.10] btrfs: scrub: always update btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical
Date: Sat,  6 Dec 2025 09:02:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251206140252.645973-7-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251206140252.645973-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 54df8b80cc63aa0f22c4590cad11542731ed43ff ]

[BUG]
When a scrub failed immediately without any byte scrubbed, the returned
btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical will always be 0, even if there is a
non-zero @start passed into btrfs_scrub_dev() for resume cases.

This will reset the progress and make later scrub resume start from the
beginning.

[CAUSE]
The function btrfs_scrub_dev() accepts a @progress parameter to copy its
updated progress to the caller, there are cases where we either don't
touch progress::last_physical at all or copy 0 into last_physical:

- last_physical not updated at all
  If some error happened before scrubbing any super block or chunk, we
  will not copy the progress, leaving the @last_physical untouched.

  E.g. failed to allocate @sctx, scrubbing a missing device or even
  there is already a running scrub and so on.

  All those cases won't touch @progress at all, resulting the
  last_physical untouched and will be left as 0 for most cases.

- Error out before scrubbing any bytes
  In those case we allocated @sctx, and sctx->stat.last_physical is all
  zero (initialized by kvzalloc()).
  Unfortunately some critical errors happened during
  scrub_enumerate_chunks() or scrub_supers() before any stripe is really
  scrubbed.

  In that case although we will copy sctx->stat back to @progress, since
  no byte is really scrubbed, last_physical will be overwritten to 0.

[FIX]
Make sure the parameter @progress always has its @last_physical member
updated to @start parameter inside btrfs_scrub_dev().

At the very beginning of the function, set @progress->last_physical to
@start, so that even if we error out without doing progress copying,
last_physical is still at @start.

Then after we got @sctx allocated, set sctx->stat.last_physical to
@start, this will make sure even if we didn't get any byte scrubbed, at
the progress copying stage the @last_physical is not left as zero.

This should resolve the resume progress reset problem.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---

LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:



 fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index ba20d9286a340..cff67ed630196 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -3039,6 +3039,10 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
 	unsigned int nofs_flag;
 	bool need_commit = false;
 
+	/* Set the basic fallback @last_physical before we got a sctx. */
+	if (progress)
+		progress->last_physical = start;
+
 	if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
@@ -3057,6 +3061,7 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start,
 	sctx = scrub_setup_ctx(fs_info, is_dev_replace);
 	if (IS_ERR(sctx))
 		return PTR_ERR(sctx);
+	sctx->stat.last_physical = start;
 
 	ret = scrub_workers_get(fs_info);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.51.0


       reply	other threads:[~2025-12-06 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20251206140252.645973-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-12-06 14:02 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
     [not found] <20251209001610.611575-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-12-09  0:15 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.18-5.10] btrfs: scrub: always update btrfs_scrub_progress::last_physical Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251206140252.645973-7-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox