From: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix use-after-free warning in btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:01:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251212010145.4002230-1-loemra.dev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H6_9wZeTOti72jpM=6iCCpQa-U5pNyekToEq0AfCfWmqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:50:17 +0000 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:21 PM Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Previously, btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node sets the delayed_node's
> > refcount before acquiring the root->delayed_nodes lock.
> > Commit e8513c012de7 ("btrfs: implement ref_tracker for delayed_nodes")
> > moves refcount_set inside the critical section which means
> > there is no longer a memory barrier between setting the refcount and
> > setting btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node.
> >
> > This allows btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node to set
> > btrfs_inode->delayed_node before setting the refcount.
> > A different thread is then able to read and increase the refcount
> > of btrfs_inode->delayed_node leading to a refcounting bug and
> > a use-after-free warning.
> >
> > The fix is to move refcount_set back to where it was to take
> > advantage of the implicit memory barrier provided by lock
> > acquisition.
> >
> > Fixes: e8513c012de7 ("btrfs: implement ref_tracker for delayed_nodes")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202511262228.6dda231e-lkp@intel.com
> > Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> > index 364814642a91..81922556379d 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> > @@ -152,37 +152,39 @@ static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > btrfs_init_delayed_node(node, root, ino);
> >
> > + /* Cached in the inode and can be accessed. */
> > + refcount_set(&node->refs, 2);
> > + btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_alloc(node, tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_alloc(node, &node->inode_cache_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> Now that we do these allocations outside the spinlock (xarray's lock),
> we can stop using GFP_ATOMIC and use GFP_NOFS.
>
> Otherwise it looks good, thanks.
Did you want me to send out a v3 for this change?
>
> > +
> > /* Allocate and reserve the slot, from now it can return a NULL from xa_load(). */
> > ret = xa_reserve(&root->delayed_nodes, ino, GFP_NOFS);
> > - if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
> > - btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_dir_exit(node);
> > - kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
> > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > - }
> > + if (ret == -ENOMEM)
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > xa_lock(&root->delayed_nodes);
> > ptr = xa_load(&root->delayed_nodes, ino);
> > if (ptr) {
> > /* Somebody inserted it, go back and read it. */
> > xa_unlock(&root->delayed_nodes);
> > - btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_dir_exit(node);
> > - kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
> > - node = NULL;
> > - goto again;
> > + goto cleanup;
> > }
> > ptr = __xa_store(&root->delayed_nodes, ino, node, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > ASSERT(xa_err(ptr) != -EINVAL);
> > ASSERT(xa_err(ptr) != -ENOMEM);
> > ASSERT(ptr == NULL);
> > -
> > - /* Cached in the inode and can be accessed. */
> > - refcount_set(&node->refs, 2);
> > - btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_alloc(node, tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > - btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_alloc(node, &node->inode_cache_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -
> > btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node;
> > xa_unlock(&root->delayed_nodes);
> >
> > return node;
> > +cleanup:
> > + btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_free(node, tracker);
> > + btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_free(node, &node->inode_cache_tracker);
> > + btrfs_delayed_node_ref_tracker_dir_exit(node);
> > + kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + goto again;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-12 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 21:21 [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix use-after-free warning in btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node Leo Martins
2025-12-03 10:50 ` Filipe Manana
2025-12-12 1:01 ` Leo Martins [this message]
2025-12-12 9:32 ` Filipe Manana
2025-12-13 1:28 ` Leo Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251212010145.4002230-1-loemra.dev@gmail.com \
--to=loemra.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox