public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: consolidate reclaim readiness checks in btrfs_should_reclaim()
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 18:39:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251231111623.30136-5-sunk67188@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251231111623.30136-1-sunk67188@gmail.com>

Move the filesystem state validation from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work() into
btrfs_should_reclaim() to centralize the reclaim eligibility logic.
Since it is the only caller of btrfs_should_reclaim(), there's no
functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 1dcc5dccef05..944857bd6af6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1804,6 +1804,12 @@ static int reclaim_bgs_cmp(void *unused, const struct list_head *a,
 
 static inline bool btrfs_should_reclaim(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
+	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
+		return false;
+
+	if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
+		return false;
+
 	if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
 		return btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(fs_info);
 	return true;
@@ -1838,12 +1844,6 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
 	LIST_HEAD(retry_list);
 
-	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
-		return;
-
-	if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
-		return;
-
 	if (!btrfs_should_reclaim(fs_info))
 		return;
 
-- 
2.51.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-31 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-31 10:39 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition with some cleanup Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: change block group reclaim_mark to bool Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: reorder btrfs_block_group members to reduce struct size Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: use proper types for btrfs_block_group fields Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` Sun YangKai [this message]
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: use u8 for reclaim threshold type Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: clarify reclaim sweep control flow Sun YangKai
2025-12-31 10:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition Sun YangKai
2026-01-01  0:20   ` Qu Wenruo
2026-01-01 11:44     ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-01  0:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition with some cleanup Qu Wenruo
2026-01-01 11:54   ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-01 21:14     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-01-03 11:17       ` Sun Yangkai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251231111623.30136-5-sunk67188@gmail.com \
    --to=sunk67188@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox