public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: use proper types for btrfs_block_group fields
Date: Sat,  3 Jan 2026 20:19:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260103122504.10924-8-sunk67188@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260103122504.10924-2-sunk67188@gmail.com>

Convert disk_cache_state and cached fields in struct btrfs_block_group
from int to their respective enum types (enum btrfs_disk_cache_state
and enum btrfs_caching_type). Also change btrfs_block_group_done() to
return bool instead of int since it returns a boolean comparison.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.h b/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
index 88c2e3a0a5a0..bbd9371e33fd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
@@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ struct btrfs_block_group {
 
 	unsigned int ro;
 
-	int disk_cache_state;
+	enum btrfs_disk_cache_state disk_cache_state;
 
 	/* Cache tracking stuff */
-	int cached;
+	enum btrfs_caching_type cached;
 	struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
 
 	struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ static inline u64 btrfs_system_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	return btrfs_get_alloc_profile(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM);
 }
 
-static inline int btrfs_block_group_done(const struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
+static inline bool btrfs_block_group_done(const struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
 {
 	smp_mb();
 	return cache->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED ||
-- 
2.51.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-03 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-03 12:19 [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition with some cleanup Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition Sun YangKai
2026-01-04 19:40   ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-05 13:00     ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-05 18:21       ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-07 14:09         ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-07 17:57           ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-08 15:11             ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: use u8 for reclaim threshold type Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: clarify reclaim sweep control flow Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: change block group reclaim_mark to bool Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: reorder btrfs_block_group members to reduce struct size Sun YangKai
2026-01-05 15:07   ` Filipe Manana
2026-01-05 15:26     ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` Sun YangKai [this message]
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: consolidate reclaim readiness checks in btrfs_should_reclaim() Sun YangKai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260103122504.10924-8-sunk67188@gmail.com \
    --to=sunk67188@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox