From: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: consolidate reclaim readiness checks in btrfs_should_reclaim()
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 20:19:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260103122504.10924-9-sunk67188@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260103122504.10924-2-sunk67188@gmail.com>
Move the filesystem state validation from btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work() into
btrfs_should_reclaim() to centralize the reclaim eligibility logic.
Since it is the only caller of btrfs_should_reclaim(), there's no
functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sun YangKai <sunk67188@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index f29553fa204a..39e6f1bf3506 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1804,6 +1804,12 @@ static int reclaim_bgs_cmp(void *unused, const struct list_head *a,
static inline bool btrfs_should_reclaim(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
+ if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
+ return false;
+
+ if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
+ return false;
+
if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
return btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(fs_info);
return true;
@@ -1838,12 +1844,6 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
LIST_HEAD(retry_list);
- if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
- return;
-
- if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info))
- return;
-
if (!btrfs_should_reclaim(fs_info))
return;
--
2.51.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-03 12:19 [PATCH v2 0/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition with some cleanup Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: fix periodic reclaim condition Sun YangKai
2026-01-04 19:40 ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-05 13:00 ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-05 18:21 ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-07 14:09 ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-07 17:57 ` Boris Burkov
2026-01-08 15:11 ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: use u8 for reclaim threshold type Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: clarify reclaim sweep control flow Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: change block group reclaim_mark to bool Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: reorder btrfs_block_group members to reduce struct size Sun YangKai
2026-01-05 15:07 ` Filipe Manana
2026-01-05 15:26 ` Sun Yangkai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: use proper types for btrfs_block_group fields Sun YangKai
2026-01-03 12:19 ` Sun YangKai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260103122504.10924-9-sunk67188@gmail.com \
--to=sunk67188@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox