public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>, Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Subject: [PATCH v8 15/17] btrfs: allow balancing remap tree
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2026 14:09:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107141015.25819-16-mark@harmstone.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107141015.25819-1-mark@harmstone.com>

Balancing the METADATA_REMAP chunk, i.e. the chunk in which the remap tree
lives, is a special case.

We can't use the remap tree itself for this, as then we'd have no way to
boostrap it on mount. And we can't use the pre-remap tree code for this
as it relies on walking the extent tree, and we're not creating backrefs
for METADATA_REMAP chunks.

So instead, if a balance would relocate any METADATA_REMAP block groups, mark
those block groups as readonly and COW every leaf of the remap tree.

There's more sophisticated ways of doing this, such as only COWing nodes
within a block group that's to be relocated, but they're fiddly and with
lots of edge cases. Plus it's not anticipated that a) the number of
METADATA_REMAP chunks is going to be particularly large, or b) that users will
want to only relocate some of these chunks - the main use case here is
to unbreak RAID conversion and device removal.

Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index b0aef4d489e7..96a3c0752f91 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -4000,8 +4000,11 @@ static bool should_balance_chunk(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_chunk
 	struct btrfs_balance_args *bargs = NULL;
 	u64 chunk_type = btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk);
 
-	if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA_REMAP)
-		return false;
+	/* Treat METADATA_REMAP chunks as METADATA. */
+	if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA_REMAP) {
+		chunk_type &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA_REMAP;
+		chunk_type |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
+	}
 
 	/* type filter */
 	if (!((chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) &
@@ -4084,6 +4087,113 @@ static bool should_balance_chunk(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_chunk
 	return true;
 }
 
+struct remap_chunk_info {
+	struct list_head list;
+	u64 offset;
+	struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
+	bool made_ro;
+};
+
+static int cow_remap_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+			  struct btrfs_path *path)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
+	struct btrfs_key key = { 0 };
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, fs_info->remap_root, &key, path, 0, 1);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	while (true) {
+		ret = btrfs_next_leaf(fs_info->remap_root, path);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			return ret;
+		} else if (ret > 0) {
+			ret = 0;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
+
+		btrfs_release_path(path);
+
+		ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, fs_info->remap_root, &key, path,
+					0, 1);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int balance_remap_chunks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				struct btrfs_path *path,
+				struct list_head *chunks)
+{
+	struct remap_chunk_info *rci, *tmp;
+	struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+	int ret;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(rci, tmp, chunks, list) {
+		rci->bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, rci->offset);
+		if (!rci->bg) {
+			list_del(&rci->list);
+			kfree(rci);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		ret = btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(rci->bg, false);
+		if (ret)
+			goto end;
+
+		rci->made_ro = true;
+	}
+
+	if (list_empty(chunks))
+		return 0;
+
+	trans = btrfs_start_transaction(fs_info->remap_root, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&fs_info->remap_mutex);
+
+	ret = cow_remap_tree(trans, path);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->remap_mutex);
+
+	btrfs_release_path(path);
+
+	btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
+
+end:
+	while (!list_empty(chunks)) {
+		bool is_unused;
+
+		rci = list_first_entry(chunks, struct remap_chunk_info, list);
+
+		spin_lock(&rci->bg->lock);
+		is_unused = !btrfs_is_block_group_used(rci->bg);
+		spin_unlock(&rci->bg->lock);
+
+		if (is_unused)
+			btrfs_mark_bg_unused(rci->bg);
+
+		if (rci->made_ro)
+			btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(rci->bg);
+
+		btrfs_put_block_group(rci->bg);
+
+		list_del(&rci->list);
+		kfree(rci);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
 	struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl = fs_info->balance_ctl;
@@ -4106,6 +4216,9 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	u32 count_meta = 0;
 	u32 count_sys = 0;
 	int chunk_reserved = 0;
+	struct remap_chunk_info *rci;
+	unsigned int num_remap_chunks = 0;
+	LIST_HEAD(remap_chunks);
 
 	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
 	if (!path) {
@@ -4204,7 +4317,8 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 				count_data++;
 			else if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
 				count_sys++;
-			else if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
+			else if (chunk_type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
+					       BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA_REMAP))
 				count_meta++;
 
 			goto loop;
@@ -4224,6 +4338,30 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 			goto loop;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * Balancing METADATA_REMAP chunks takes place separately - add
+		 * the details to a list so it can be processed later.
+		 */
+		if (chunk_type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA_REMAP) {
+			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
+
+			rci = kmalloc(sizeof(struct remap_chunk_info),
+				      GFP_NOFS);
+			if (!rci) {
+				ret = -ENOMEM;
+				goto error;
+			}
+
+			rci->offset = found_key.offset;
+			rci->bg = NULL;
+			rci->made_ro = false;
+			list_add_tail(&rci->list, &remap_chunks);
+
+			num_remap_chunks++;
+
+			goto loop;
+		}
+
 		if (!chunk_reserved) {
 			/*
 			 * We may be relocating the only data chunk we have,
@@ -4263,11 +4401,24 @@ static int __btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 		key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
 	}
 
+	btrfs_release_path(path);
+
 	if (counting) {
-		btrfs_release_path(path);
 		counting = false;
 		goto again;
 	}
+
+	if (!list_empty(&remap_chunks)) {
+		ret = balance_remap_chunks(fs_info, path, &remap_chunks);
+		if (ret == -ENOSPC)
+			enospc_errors++;
+
+		if (!ret) {
+			spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
+			bctl->stat.completed += num_remap_chunks;
+			spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
+		}
+	}
 error:
 	if (enospc_errors) {
 		btrfs_info(fs_info, "%d enospc errors during balance",
-- 
2.51.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-07 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07 14:09 [PATCH v8 00/17] Remap tree Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] btrfs: add definitions and constants for remap-tree Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] btrfs: add METADATA_REMAP chunk type Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] btrfs: allow remapped chunks to have zero stripes Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] btrfs: remove remapped block groups from the free-space tree Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] btrfs: don't add metadata items for the remap tree to the extent tree Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] btrfs: rename struct btrfs_block_group field commit_used to last_used Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] btrfs: add extended version of struct block_group_item Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] btrfs: allow mounting filesystems with remap-tree incompat flag Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] btrfs: redirect I/O for remapped block groups Mark Harmstone
2026-01-25 12:57   ` Chris Mason
2026-02-18 14:29     ` Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] btrfs: handle deletions from remapped block group Mark Harmstone
2026-01-25 12:49   ` Chris Mason
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] btrfs: handle setting up relocation of block group with remap-tree Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] btrfs: move existing remaps before relocating block group Mark Harmstone
2026-01-25 12:38   ` Chris Mason
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] btrfs: replace identity remaps with actual remaps when doing relocations Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] btrfs: add do_remap param to btrfs_discard_extent() Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` Mark Harmstone [this message]
2026-01-25 12:00   ` [PATCH v8 15/17] btrfs: allow balancing remap tree Chris Mason
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] btrfs: handle discarding fully-remapped block groups Mark Harmstone
2026-01-07 14:09 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] btrfs: populate fully_remapped_bgs_list on mount Mark Harmstone
2026-01-21 22:12 ` [PATCH v8 00/17] Remap tree David Sterba
2026-01-23 10:04   ` Filipe Manana
2026-01-23 10:15     ` Mark Harmstone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260107141015.25819-16-mark@harmstone.com \
    --to=mark@harmstone.com \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox