From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 05:30:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260126043042.GB30803@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260124205329.GE2762@quark>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 12:53:29PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > +void generic_readahead_merkle_tree(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> > + unsigned long nr_pages)
> > {
> > struct folio *folio;
> >
> > folio = __filemap_get_folio(inode->i_mapping, index, FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
> > - if (IS_ERR(folio) || !folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(folio) == -ENOENT || !folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
>
> This dereferences an ERR_PTR() when __filemap_get_folio() returns an
> error other than -ENOENT.
Yes. I've fixed that and split the change in error handling into a
separate well described prep patch while at it.
> I think the correct thing to do here would be the following:
>
> if (inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree)
> inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree(inode, index,
> last_index - index + 1);
>
> Then __fsverity_readahead() can be folded into fsverity_readahead().
I've done that, and also added a little comment.
>
> > +void __fsverity_readahead(struct inode *inode, const struct fsverity_info *vi,
> > + loff_t data_start_pos, unsigned long nr_pages)
> > +{
> > + const struct merkle_tree_params *params = &vi->tree_params;
> > + u64 start_hidx = data_start_pos >> params->log_blocksize;
> > + u64 end_hidx = (data_start_pos + ((nr_pages - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT)) >>
> > + params->log_blocksize;
>
> (nr_pages - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT can overflow an 'unsigned long'.
> (nr_pages - 1) needs to be cast to u64 before doing the shift.
>
> But also it would make more sense to pass
> (pgoff_t start_index, unsigned long nr_pages) instead of
> (loff_t data_start_pos, unsigned long nr_pages),
> so that the two numbers have the same units.
>
> start_idx and end_hidx could then be computed as follows:
>
> u64 start_hidx = (u64)start_index << params->log_blocks_per_page;
> u64 end_hidx = (((u64)start_index + nr_pages) << params->log_blocks_per_page) - 1;
>
> Note that fsverity_readahead() derives the position from the index. If
> it just used the index directly, that would be more direct.
Yes, I've updated that. Having proper types and/or conversion helpers
for the fsverity specific addressing would be really nice as well,
but I've not touched that for now.
> > + int level;
> > +
> > + if (!inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree)
> > + return;
> > + if (unlikely(data_start_pos >= inode->i_size))
> > + return;
>
> The check against i_size shouldn't be necessary: the caller should just
> call this only for data it's actually going to read.
This check is based on / copied from the check in verify_data_block.
Now we only kick off readahead now and and don't actually do anything
with the read blocks, so I'll take your word that this can be removed.
> > + for (level = 0; level < params->num_levels; level++) {
> > + unsigned long level_start = params->level_start[level];
> > + unsigned long next_start_hidx = start_hidx >> params->log_arity;
> > + unsigned long next_end_hidx = end_hidx >> params->log_arity;
> > + unsigned long start_idx = (level_start + next_start_hidx) >>
> > + params->log_blocks_per_page;
> > + unsigned long end_idx = (level_start + next_end_hidx) >>
> > + params->log_blocks_per_page;
>
> start_idx and end_idx should have type pgoff_t to make it clear that
> they're page indices.
Fixed.
> > +/**
> > + * fsverity_readahead() - kick off readahead on fsverity hashes
> > + * @folio: first folio that is being read
>
> folio => file data folio
>
> Otherwise it can be confused with the Merkle tree.
I've incoroporate the various suggested documentation improvements.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 8:21 fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs,fsverity: reject size changes on fsverity files in setattr_prepare Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:12 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs,fsverity: clear out fsverity_info from common code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] fsverity: pass struct file to ->write_merkle_tree_block Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 10:04 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] fsverity: start consolidating pagecache code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 10:12 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 19:27 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 20:53 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] fsverity: push out fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 21:19 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] fs: consolidate fsverity_info lookup in buffer.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: consolidate fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 22:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-25 1:31 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-25 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-26 4:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-26 20:12 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-28 21:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-28 22:14 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 15:42 ` fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260126043042.GB30803@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox