From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] fsverity: don't issue readahead for non-ENOENT errors from __filemap_get_folio
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 07:06:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202060754.270269-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202060754.270269-1-hch@lst.de>
Issuing more reads on errors is not a good idea, especially when the
most common error here is -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/verity/pagecache.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/verity/pagecache.c b/fs/verity/pagecache.c
index 01c652bc802f..1a88decace53 100644
--- a/fs/verity/pagecache.c
+++ b/fs/verity/pagecache.c
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ struct page *generic_read_merkle_tree_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
struct folio *folio;
folio = __filemap_get_folio(inode->i_mapping, index, FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(folio) || !folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
+ if (folio == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) ||
+ (!IS_ERR(folio) && !folio_test_uptodate(folio))) {
DEFINE_READAHEAD(ractl, NULL, NULL, inode->i_mapping, index);
if (!IS_ERR(folio))
@@ -30,9 +31,9 @@ struct page *generic_read_merkle_tree_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
else if (num_ra_pages > 1)
page_cache_ra_unbounded(&ractl, num_ra_pages, 0);
folio = read_mapping_folio(inode->i_mapping, index, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(folio))
- return ERR_CAST(folio);
}
+ if (IS_ERR(folio))
+ return ERR_CAST(folio);
return folio_file_page(folio, index);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_read_merkle_tree_page);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 6:06 fsverity speedup and memory usage optimization v5 Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-02-02 13:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] fsverity: don't issue readahead for non-ENOENT errors from __filemap_get_folio Jan Kara
2026-02-17 21:14 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] readahead: push invalidate_lock out of page_cache_ra_unbounded Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 13:36 ` Jan Kara
2026-02-02 15:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-02 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 21:04 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: move ->read_folio and ->readahead to readahead.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 13:32 ` Jan Kara
2026-02-03 0:57 ` Theodore Tso
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: deconstify the inode pointer in struct fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] fsverity: push out fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] fs: consolidate fsverity_info lookup in buffer.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 13:38 ` Jan Kara
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: consolidate fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 21:14 ` fsverity speedup and memory usage optimization v5 Eric Biggers
2026-02-02 22:34 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-03 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-04 14:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-04 19:02 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-04 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-04 19:37 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202060754.270269-2-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox