From: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com
Cc: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix use-after-free in move_existing_remap()
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:18:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260306141843.27186-1-mark@harmstone.com> (raw)
There is a potential use-after-free in move_existing_remap(): we're calling
btrfs_put_block_group() on dest_bg, then passing it to
btrfs_add_block_group_free_space() a few lines later.
Fix this by getting the BG at the start of the function and putting it
near the end. This also means we're not doing a lookup twice for the
same thing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20260125123908.2096548-1-clm@meta.com/
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Fixes: bbea42dfb91f ("btrfs: move existing remaps before relocating block group")
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 88b1ec416fe272..1c42c5180bddd5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4177,6 +4177,8 @@ static int move_existing_remap(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
dest_addr = ins.objectid;
dest_length = ins.offset;
+ dest_bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, dest_addr);
+
if (!is_data && !IS_ALIGNED(dest_length, fs_info->nodesize)) {
u64 new_length = ALIGN_DOWN(dest_length, fs_info->nodesize);
@@ -4287,15 +4289,12 @@ static int move_existing_remap(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (unlikely(ret))
goto end;
- dest_bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, dest_addr);
-
adjust_block_group_remap_bytes(trans, dest_bg, dest_length);
mutex_lock(&dest_bg->free_space_lock);
bg_needs_free_space = test_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEEDS_FREE_SPACE,
&dest_bg->runtime_flags);
mutex_unlock(&dest_bg->free_space_lock);
- btrfs_put_block_group(dest_bg);
if (bg_needs_free_space) {
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_free_space(trans, dest_bg);
@@ -4325,13 +4324,13 @@ static int move_existing_remap(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
}
} else {
- dest_bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, dest_addr);
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(dest_bg, dest_length, 0);
- btrfs_put_block_group(dest_bg);
ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
}
+ btrfs_put_block_group(dest_bg);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 14:18 Mark Harmstone [this message]
2026-03-09 6:48 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: fix use-after-free in move_existing_remap() Johannes Thumshirn
2026-03-16 9:16 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260306141843.27186-1-mark@harmstone.com \
--to=mark@harmstone.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox