From: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
To: dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com
Cc: wqu@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
r33s3n6@gmail.com, zzzccc427@gmail.com,
ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: add tree parent check to btrfs_buffer_uptodate()
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:19:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313091924.570554-2-gality369@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313091924.570554-1-gality369@gmail.com>
btrfs_buffer_uptodate() only checks whether an extent buffer is uptodate
and whether its generation matches the expected parent transid.
For callers that also need tree-parent verification, this is not enough on
a cache hit, because a cached extent buffer can be reported uptodate
without being checked against the expected level/first_key constraints.
Extend btrfs_buffer_uptodate() to take an optional
btrfs_tree_parent_check so cached buffers can be verified before being
reported uptodate.
For now all callers pass NULL, so there is no functional change. A
follow-up patch will use the new argument on the relevant cached-hit path.
Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 14 +++++++++++---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 3 ++-
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 561658aca018..c008b847200a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ read_block_for_search(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *p,
reada_for_search(fs_info, p, parent_level, slot, key->objectid);
/* first we do an atomic uptodate check */
- if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(tmp, check.transid, true) > 0) {
+ if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(tmp, check.transid, true, NULL) > 0) {
/*
* Do extra check for first_key, eb can be stale due to
* being cached, read from scrub, or have multiple
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 900e462d8ea1..8773f1f7ea46 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -116,13 +116,21 @@ static void csum_tree_block(struct extent_buffer *buf, u8 *result)
* detect blocks that either didn't get written at all or got written
* in the wrong place.
*/
-int btrfs_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb, u64 parent_transid, bool atomic)
+int btrfs_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *eb, u64 parent_transid, bool atomic,
+ const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check)
{
if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(eb))
return 0;
- if (!parent_transid || btrfs_header_generation(eb) == parent_transid)
+ if (!parent_transid || btrfs_header_generation(eb) == parent_transid) {
+ /*
+ * On a cache hit, the caller may still need tree parent
+ * verification before reusing the buffer.
+ */
+ if (check && btrfs_verify_level_key(eb, check))
+ return -EUCLEAN;
return 1;
+ }
if (atomic)
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1046,7 +1054,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *read_tree_root_path(struct btrfs_root *tree_root,
root->node = NULL;
goto fail;
}
- if (unlikely(!btrfs_buffer_uptodate(root->node, generation, false))) {
+ if (unlikely(!btrfs_buffer_uptodate(root->node, generation, false, NULL))) {
ret = -EIO;
goto fail;
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
index 57920f2c6fe4..aef106484dbe 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ static inline struct btrfs_root *btrfs_grab_root(struct btrfs_root *root)
void btrfs_put_root(struct btrfs_root *root);
void btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct extent_buffer *buf);
-int btrfs_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 parent_transid, bool atomic);
+int btrfs_buffer_uptodate(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 parent_transid, bool atomic,
+ const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check);
int btrfs_read_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *buf,
const struct btrfs_tree_parent_check *check);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index dc4ca98c3780..54daa8672272 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -5584,7 +5584,7 @@ static int check_next_block_uptodate(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
generation = btrfs_node_ptr_generation(path->nodes[level], path->slots[level]);
- if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(next, generation, false))
+ if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(next, generation, false, NULL))
return 0;
check.level = level - 1;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 14da72a9a950..93eed1d3716c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4574,7 +4574,7 @@ void btrfs_readahead_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (IS_ERR(eb))
return;
- if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(eb, gen, true)) {
+ if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(eb, gen, true, NULL)) {
free_extent_buffer(eb);
return;
}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 30f3c3b849c1..ff1a83d26598 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static int process_one_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
return ret;
}
- if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(eb, gen, false) && level == 0) {
+ if (btrfs_buffer_uptodate(eb, gen, false, NULL) && level == 0) {
ret = btrfs_exclude_logged_extents(eb);
if (ret)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 9:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: verify cached extent buffers against tree parent checks ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-13 9:19 ` ZhengYuan Huang [this message]
2026-03-13 9:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: revalidate cached tree blocks on the uptodate path ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-15 21:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-13 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: verify cached extent buffers against tree parent checks Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260313091924.570554-2-gality369@gmail.com \
--to=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r33s3n6@gmail.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox