From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: decrease indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:25:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317132526.299099-1-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> (raw)
Decrease the indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop(), by inverting
the check if the loop state is smaller than LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE.
This also allows for an early return from find_free_extent_update_loop(),
in case LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE is already set at this point.
While at if change a
if () {
}
else if
else
pattern to all using curly braces and be consistent with the rest of btrfs
code.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index a55b910c755b..062fc1beb26b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4349,71 +4349,74 @@ static int find_free_extent_update_loop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
return 1;
/* See the comments for btrfs_loop_type for an explanation of the phases. */
- if (ffe_ctl->loop < LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
- ffe_ctl->index = 0;
- /*
- * We want to skip the LOOP_CACHING_WAIT step if we don't have
- * any uncached bgs and we've already done a full search
- * through.
- */
- if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT &&
- (!ffe_ctl->orig_have_caching_bg && full_search))
- ffe_ctl->loop++;
+ if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ ffe_ctl->index = 0;
+ /*
+ * We want to skip the LOOP_CACHING_WAIT step if we don't have
+ * any uncached bgs and we've already done a full search
+ * through.
+ */
+ if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT &&
+ (!ffe_ctl->orig_have_caching_bg && full_search))
ffe_ctl->loop++;
+ ffe_ctl->loop++;
- if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
- struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
- int exist = 0;
+ if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
+ struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+ int exist = 0;
- /* Check if allocation policy allows to create a new chunk */
- ret = can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ /* Check if allocation policy allows to create a new chunk */
+ ret = can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- trans = current->journal_info;
- if (trans)
- exist = 1;
- else
- trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
+ trans = current->journal_info;
+ if (trans)
+ exist = 1;
+ else
+ trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
- if (IS_ERR(trans))
- return PTR_ERR(trans);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans))
+ return PTR_ERR(trans);
- ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, space_info, ffe_ctl->flags,
- CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT);
+ ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, space_info, ffe_ctl->flags,
+ CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT);
- /* Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we can do more. */
- if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
- ret = 0;
- ffe_ctl->loop++;
- }
- else if (ret < 0)
- btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
- else
- ret = 0;
- if (!exist)
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ /* Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we can do more. */
+ if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
+ ret = 0;
+ ffe_ctl->loop++;
+ } else if (ret < 0) {
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+ } else {
+ ret = 0;
}
- if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
- if (ffe_ctl->policy != BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED)
- return -ENOSPC;
+ if (!exist)
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
- /*
- * Don't loop again if we already have no empty_size and
- * no empty_cluster.
- */
- if (ffe_ctl->empty_size == 0 &&
- ffe_ctl->empty_cluster == 0)
- return -ENOSPC;
- ffe_ctl->empty_size = 0;
- ffe_ctl->empty_cluster = 0;
- }
- return 1;
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
+ if (ffe_ctl->policy != BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't loop again if we already have no empty_size and
+ * no empty_cluster.
+ */
+ if (ffe_ctl->empty_size == 0 &&
+ ffe_ctl->empty_cluster == 0)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ ffe_ctl->empty_size = 0;
+ ffe_ctl->empty_cluster = 0;
}
- return -ENOSPC;
+
+ return 1;
}
static int prepare_allocation_clustered(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 13:25 Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2026-03-17 19:54 ` [PATCH] btrfs: decrease indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260317132526.299099-1-johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--to=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox