public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] btrfs: decrease indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop
@ 2026-03-18  7:17 Johannes Thumshirn
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Johannes Thumshirn @ 2026-03-18  7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Johannes Thumshirn, Filipe Manana

Decrease the indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop(), by inverting
the check if the loop state is smaller than LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE.

This also allows for an early return from find_free_extent_update_loop(),
in case LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE is already set at this point.

While at it change a

if () {
}
else if
else

pattern to all using curly braces and be consistent with the rest of btrfs
code.

Also change 'int exists' to 'bool have_trans' giving it a more meaningful
name and type.

No functional changes intended.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
Changes to v1:
- Fix typo in commit mesage
- Add Filipe's R-b
- int exist -> bool have_trans
- Add punctation to th eone comment without
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index a55b910c755b..c42cfe531a5e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4349,71 +4349,74 @@ static int find_free_extent_update_loop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		return 1;
 
 	/* See the comments for btrfs_loop_type for an explanation of the phases. */
-	if (ffe_ctl->loop < LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
-		ffe_ctl->index = 0;
-		/*
-		 * We want to skip the LOOP_CACHING_WAIT step if we don't have
-		 * any uncached bgs and we've already done a full search
-		 * through.
-		 */
-		if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT &&
-		    (!ffe_ctl->orig_have_caching_bg && full_search))
-			ffe_ctl->loop++;
+	if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	ffe_ctl->index = 0;
+	/*
+	 * We want to skip the LOOP_CACHING_WAIT step if we don't have
+	 * any uncached bgs and we've already done a full search
+	 * through.
+	 */
+	if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_CACHING_NOWAIT &&
+	    (!ffe_ctl->orig_have_caching_bg && full_search))
 		ffe_ctl->loop++;
+	ffe_ctl->loop++;
 
-		if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
-			struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
-			int exist = 0;
+	if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
+		struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
+		bool have_trans = false;
 
-			/* Check if allocation policy allows to create a new chunk */
-			ret = can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
+		/* Check if allocation policy allows to create a new chunk. */
+		ret = can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
-			trans = current->journal_info;
-			if (trans)
-				exist = 1;
-			else
-				trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
+		trans = current->journal_info;
+		if (trans)
+			have_trans = true;
+		else
+			trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
 
-			if (IS_ERR(trans))
-				return PTR_ERR(trans);
+		if (IS_ERR(trans))
+			return PTR_ERR(trans);
 
-			ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, space_info, ffe_ctl->flags,
-						CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT);
+		ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, space_info, ffe_ctl->flags,
+					CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE_FOR_EXTENT);
 
-			/* Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we can do more. */
-			if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
-				ret = 0;
-				ffe_ctl->loop++;
-			}
-			else if (ret < 0)
-				btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
-			else
-				ret = 0;
-			if (!exist)
-				btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
+		/* Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we can do more. */
+		if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
+			ret = 0;
+			ffe_ctl->loop++;
+		} else if (ret < 0) {
+			btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
+		} else {
+			ret = 0;
 		}
 
-		if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
-			if (ffe_ctl->policy != BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED)
-				return -ENOSPC;
+		if (!have_trans)
+			btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
 
-			/*
-			 * Don't loop again if we already have no empty_size and
-			 * no empty_cluster.
-			 */
-			if (ffe_ctl->empty_size == 0 &&
-			    ffe_ctl->empty_cluster == 0)
-				return -ENOSPC;
-			ffe_ctl->empty_size = 0;
-			ffe_ctl->empty_cluster = 0;
-		}
-		return 1;
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (ffe_ctl->loop == LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE) {
+		if (ffe_ctl->policy != BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED)
+			return -ENOSPC;
+
+		/*
+		 * Don't loop again if we already have no empty_size and
+		 * no empty_cluster.
+		 */
+		if (ffe_ctl->empty_size == 0 &&
+		    ffe_ctl->empty_cluster == 0)
+			return -ENOSPC;
+		ffe_ctl->empty_size = 0;
+		ffe_ctl->empty_cluster = 0;
 	}
-	return -ENOSPC;
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int prepare_allocation_clustered(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-03-18  7:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-18  7:17 [PATCH v2] btrfs: decrease indendation of find_free_extent_update_loop Johannes Thumshirn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox