* [PATCH] btrfs: fix bytes_may_use leak in move_existing_remap()
@ 2026-03-23 14:36 Mark Harmstone
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mark Harmstone @ 2026-03-23 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Mark Harmstone
If the call to btrfs_reserve_extent() in move_existing_remap() returns a
smaller extent than we asked for, currently we're not undoing the
bytes_may_use change that we made. Fix this by calling
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use() again for the difference.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
Fixes: bbea42dfb91f ("btrfs: move existing remaps before relocating block group")
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 1c42c5180bddd5..3d1756b6116246 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4174,6 +4174,12 @@ static int move_existing_remap(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
return ret;
}
+ if (ins.offset < length) {
+ spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
+ btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use(sinfo, ins.offset - length);
+ spin_unlock(&sinfo->lock);
+ }
+
dest_addr = ins.objectid;
dest_length = ins.offset;
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-03-23 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-23 14:36 [PATCH] btrfs: fix bytes_may_use leak in move_existing_remap() Mark Harmstone
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox