From: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: check: recognize verity item keys in original mode
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:05:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324230519.57167-1-loemra.dev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <298ed1b9-72e3-45ac-9d3c-41cb3cf50029@gmx.com>
On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 09:19:00 +1030 Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2026/3/25 05:22, Leo Martins 写道:
> > Commit 4e88bb6e ("btrfs-progs: enhance detection on unknown inode keys")
> > added stricter validation for inode keys in the original mode checker,
> > flagging unknown key types as errors. However, it did not add cases for
> > BTRFS_VERITY_DESC_ITEM_KEY (36) and BTRFS_VERITY_MERKLE_ITEM_KEY (37),
> > causing any filesystem with fs-verity enabled files to fail the check
> > with:
> >
> > ERROR: unknown key (257 36 0) found in leaf 30621696
> >
> > Add the missing switch cases so that verity metadata items are
> > recognized and silently skipped during the check, matching the behavior
> > of lowmem mode which already handles them.
>
> Unfortunately I noticed that, lowmem mode doesn't have such handling either.
>
> As I created a test case with verity items, and CI failed due to false
> alerts from CI.
>
> I'll send out a small fix for the lowmem mode, along with the test case.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
Good catch, not sure how I missed that, thanks!
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Martins <loemra.dev@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > check/main.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/check/main.c b/check/main.c
> > index c96969fd..4fdd8867 100644
> > --- a/check/main.c
> > +++ b/check/main.c
> > @@ -1895,6 +1895,9 @@ static int process_one_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> > case BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY:
> > ret = process_xattr_item(eb, i, &key, active_node);
> > break;
> > + case BTRFS_VERITY_DESC_ITEM_KEY:
> > + case BTRFS_VERITY_MERKLE_ITEM_KEY:
> > + break;
> > default:
> > error("unknown key (%llu %u %llu) found in leaf %llu",
> > key.objectid, key.type, key.offset, eb->start);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 18:52 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: check: recognize verity item keys in original mode Leo Martins
2026-03-24 21:05 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-24 22:49 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-24 23:05 ` Leo Martins [this message]
2026-03-24 22:49 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324230519.57167-1-loemra.dev@gmail.com \
--to=loemra.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox