public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: remove COW fixup and checked folio flag
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 19:49:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260413174912.GA12792@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1775621833.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:55:30PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For experimental builds we're already rejecting dirty folios which
> don't have ordered flags since v6.15.
> 
> Unfortunately we're not yet removing that COW fixup machanism for
> non-experimental builds even at v7.0, as there are still some error
> corner cases that can lead to dirty folios without ordered flags.
> 
> After those years of testing, we're sure we won't need COW fixup for
> regular cases. Although I want to remove the COW fixup mechanism after
> all known reproducible cases are fixed, I run out of ideas.

I don't know if I understand this correctly, are there known bugs that
the fixup can catch, but there are not known fixes/root causes?

> Furthermore for the future of huge folios (order 9, 2M page on 4K page
> size systems), we can not afford the extra bitmap for a huge folio.
> In that case, a huge folio will need 64 bytes per bitmap, which is no
> longer a small amount.
> 
> I believe it's time to remove the COW fixup mechanism even for
> non-experimental builds, along with the checked folio flags.

Yes please, it has served us well and caused some scars but now it's
dead code.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-13 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08  4:25 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: remove COW fixup and checked folio flag Qu Wenruo
2026-04-08  4:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: remove the COW fixup mechanism Qu Wenruo
2026-04-13 17:50   ` David Sterba
2026-04-08  4:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: remove folio checked subpage bitmap tracking Qu Wenruo
2026-04-13 17:49 ` David Sterba [this message]
2026-04-13 21:46   ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: remove COW fixup and checked folio flag Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260413174912.GA12792@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox