Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, sforshee@kernel.org, wqu@suse.com
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, brauner@kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cui.tao@linux.dev,
	Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: allow idmapped DEFRAG ioctls
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:22:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815132259.3935817-1-cui.tao@linux.dev> (raw)

From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>

btrfs_ioctl_defrag() checks MAY_WRITE against nop_mnt_idmap, so on an
idmapped mount the owner comparison uses the caller's fsuid against the
raw on-disk uid and the ioctl fails with -EPERM even for the file's
owner.  Pass the mount idmap down so defrag works on idmapped mounts.

The check, added in 616d374efa23 ("btrfs: allow defrag on a file opened
read-only that has rw permissions"), is not a privilege gate.  It only
tests whether the file could have been opened for writing, and a user
who owns the file on the idmapped mount can already open it O_RDWR,
write() to it or fallocate() it.  Defragmenting a regular file only
rearranges the caller's own extents; there is nothing it can rewrite
that the caller could not rewrite anyway.  Whole-subvolume defrag on a
directory keeps its capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) requirement, and the
!capable() guard around this check is left as is.

FIDEDUPERANGE already works this way for unprivileged callers:
may_dedupe_file() in fs/remap_range.c compares the inode owner through
file_mnt_idmap(file) and falls back to inode_permission() with the same
idmap, and dedupe can rewrite one file's extents from another file's
contents, which is a stronger operation than defrag.

On regular mounts file_mnt_idmap() is nop_mnt_idmap and nothing
changes.

Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
---
v2: rewrite the commit message to explain why defrag is safe for
idmapped users (Seth Forshee); the code is unchanged.
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 72bc9d4f7708..607329dedd50 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2458,7 +2458,7 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_defrag(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
 		 * running and allows defrag on files open in read-only mode.
 		 */
 		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) &&
-		    inode_permission(&nop_mnt_idmap, inode, MAY_WRITE)) {
+		    inode_permission(file_mnt_idmap(file), inode, MAY_WRITE)) {
 			ret = -EPERM;
 			goto out;
 		}
-- 
2.43.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-08-15 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260815132259.3935817-1-cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox