From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Yichong Chen <chenyichong@uniontech.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: retry verity reads for not-uptodate Merkle folios
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:56:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817155652.GC54102@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoJ6ZP-jKQoWwuXT@casper.infradead.org>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 04:05:08AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:54:35AM +0800, Yichong Chen wrote:
> > btrfs_read_merkle_tree_page() can find a folio in the mapping that is not
> > uptodate. After taking the folio lock, the current code treats that state
> > as a read error and returns -EIO.
> >
> > That can make a previous transient read failure sticky. If the failed read
> > left a not-uptodate folio in the mapping, later callers find that folio and
> > fail instead of retrying the read.
> >
> > Keep the existing page-cache insertion and locking order, but retry the
> > Merkle item read when a not-uptodate folio is found in the mapping. Also
> > unlock the folio when read_key_bytes() fails so that a later caller can
> > lock it and retry the read.
> >
> > Fixes: 06ed09351b67 ("btrfs: convert btrfs_read_merkle_tree_page() to use a folio")
>
> I object to this Fixes line. I didn't introduce this problem; it was
> already there before 06ed09351b67.
You're right, however we need to keep the patch as-is because that would
require a rebase and delay sending the main 7.3 pull request, it's below
22 patches.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 2:54 [PATCH v4] btrfs: retry verity reads for not-uptodate Merkle folios Yichong Chen
2026-07-23 3:14 ` David Sterba
2026-08-17 3:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-07-23 3:15 ` David Sterba
2026-08-17 3:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-17 15:56 ` David Sterba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817155652.GC54102@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=chenyichong@uniontech.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox