From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: move async csum generation out of experimental features
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 19:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904170035.GN9053@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <700ba6c46da86ace18a502b43c5e61d16a556060.1788424754.git.wqu@suse.com>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 06:09:41PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> @@ -4437,19 +4432,6 @@ void __cold close_ctree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> */
> btrfs_flush_workqueue(fs_info->delalloc_workers);
>
> - /*
> - * We can have ordered extents getting their last reference dropped from
> - * the fs_info->workers queue because for async writes for data bios we
> - * queue a work for that queue, at btrfs_wq_submit_bio(), that runs
> - * run_one_async_done() which calls btrfs_bio_end_io() in case the bio
> - * has an error, and that later function can do the final
> - * btrfs_put_ordered_extent() on the ordered extent attached to the bio,
> - * which adds a delayed iput for the inode. So we must flush the queue
> - * so that we don't have delayed iputs after committing the current
> - * transaction below and stopping the cleaner and transaction kthreads.
> - */
> - btrfs_flush_workqueue(fs_info->workers);
In the final fs closing sequence there's always some possible
interaction between the workers, but I don't think we need an explicit
flush anymore. The work offloaded to the system workers will be done
before we get here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 8:39 [PATCH] btrfs: move async csum generation out of experimental features Qu Wenruo
2026-09-03 9:20 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-03 11:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-03 12:44 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-03 13:07 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-05 0:57 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-05 10:09 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-05 10:47 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-07 9:53 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-04 16:53 ` David Sterba
2026-09-04 16:55 ` David Sterba
2026-09-04 17:00 ` David Sterba [this message]
2026-09-04 22:21 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-07 9:59 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904170035.GN9053@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox