From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsverity: Be more careful with return value of ->get_verity_descriptor()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:06:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028180656.GC1876@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025203831.120095-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 01:38:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> If fsverity_operations::get_verity_descriptor() returns that the verity
> descriptor has 0 size, then a zero-size buffer is allocated to hold it,
> and it's called again with bufsize=0.
>
> But bufsize=0 is a special case that says to return the actual size. If
> in the meantime the filesystem has decided that the size is some
> actually valid size, it will return that size, and then
> validate_fsverity_descriptor() will read from ZERO_SIZE_PTR and crash.
>
> Of course, for the filesystem to misbehave in that strange way, it
> generally would require direct writes to the block device.
>
> Regardless, fsverity_get_descriptor() might as well guard against it.
> Make it do so. Specifically, validate that the first call to
> ->get_verity_descriptor() returns at least the minimum descriptor size,
> and validate that the second call returns the same size as the first.
>
> Fixes: fd2d1acfcadf ("fs-verity: add the hook for file ->open()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/linux.git/log/?h=for-current
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 20:38 [PATCH] fsverity: Be more careful with return value of ->get_verity_descriptor() Eric Biggers
2026-10-28 18:06 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028180656.GC1876@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox