From: lutz.euler@freenet.de (Lutz Euler)
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bulk discard doesn't work after add/delete of devices
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:34:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20356.28427.586846.710401@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20301.28303.484287.126799@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
the issue I raised in this thread is still not fixed. Please, could
someone look into it? A fix should be simple, especially as the issue is
easily reproducable. (In case the information in this thread so far is
not sufficient for that I will happily provide a recipe; just ask.)
Also, I believe so far not even a regression test has been added for
this issue.
Here's the state of affairs again, as I mailed previously:
> I have seen that in the meantime a patch for this issue has found
> its way into 3.3-rc5. Unfortunately with this kernel my filesystem still
> says "0 bytes were trimmed", so the bug is not fixed for me.
>
> Now that might just have been caused by the fact that the patch that
> went into 3.3-rc5 (as commit 2cac13e41bf5b99ffc426bd28dfd2248df1dfa67)
> is the one from Liu Bo's mail <4F3386D8.6010108@cn.fujitsu.com>, which
> I already responded to by saying it didn't help my issue.
>
> But the next patch Liu sent (in the mail
> <4F34795B.2020004@cn.fujitsu.com>) also does not help.
> At first I responded to that mail:
>
> > Thanks for providing the new patch. I think it will work in the case
> > that "fstrim" is called without specifying a range to trim (that is,
> > defaulting to the whole filesystem), but I didn't test that yet, sorry.
>
> I was too optimistic. I have now tested this second patch and still get
> "0 bytes were trimmed".
Thanks for providing btrfs! Greetings,
Lutz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-05 20:37 Bulk discard doesn't work after add/delete of devices Lutz Euler
2012-02-09 8:42 ` Liu Bo
2012-02-09 15:50 ` Lutz Euler
2012-02-10 1:56 ` Liu Bo
2012-02-12 17:01 ` Lutz Euler
2012-02-13 5:57 ` Liu Bo
2012-02-14 17:32 ` Lutz Euler
2012-02-29 0:17 ` Lutz Euler
2012-04-10 17:34 ` Lutz Euler [this message]
2012-11-14 21:10 ` Lutz Euler
2012-11-14 21:17 ` [PATCH] Btrfs: really fix trim 0 bytes after a device delete Lutz Euler
2015-01-03 15:30 ` [PATCH V2] " Lutz Euler
2015-01-03 16:16 ` fstrim not working on one of three BTRFS filesystems Lutz Euler
2015-05-19 15:18 ` Rich Freeman
2015-01-05 16:59 ` [PATCH V2] Btrfs: really fix trim 0 bytes after a device delete Martin Steigerwald
2015-01-05 19:29 ` Lutz Euler
2015-05-01 10:43 ` Martin Steigerwald
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-28 16:58 fstrim not working on one of three BTRFS filesystems Martin Steigerwald
2014-12-29 1:53 ` Robert White
2014-12-29 2:08 ` Duncan
2014-12-29 9:06 ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-12-29 13:23 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20356.28427.586846.710401@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lutz.euler@freenet.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).