linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 RESEND Rebased] readmirror feature
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:26:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <209E99E4-8859-47CD-8826-2493FBEA0407@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfd817fd-f832-6c27-8bcd-e1df9141e110@gmx.com>



> On 24 Jul 2019, at 8:20 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 2019/6/26 下午4:33, Anand Jain wrote:
>> These patches are tested to be working fine.
>> 
>> Function call chain  __btrfs_map_block()->find_live_mirror() uses
>> thread pid to determine the %mirror_num when the mirror_num=0.
>> 
>> This patch introduces a framework so that we can add policies to determine
>> the %mirror_num. And adds the devid as the readmirror policy.
>> 
>> The property is stored as an extented attributes of root inode
>> (BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID).
> 
> This doesn't look right to me.
> 
> As readmirror should work at chunk layer, putting it into root tree
> doesn't follow the layer separation of btrfs.
> 
> And furthermore, this breaks the XATTR schema. Normally we only have
> XATTR item after an INODE item, not a ROOT_ITEM.
> 
> Is the on-disk format already accepted or still under design stage?
> 

 I mentioned about the storage for this new property in the RFC patch, as I knew there will be some surprises.

 The advantage of using the XATTR on the ROOT_ITEM is there is no on-disk format update nor there is any new KEY, albeit it deviates from the traditional way of using the xattr. Also, this approach don’t need an ioctl, as things work using the existing get/set xattr interface.

 The other way I had in mind was to introduce a new Key in the dev-tree such as

    (BTRFS_READMIRROR_OBJECTID, BTRFS_PERSISTENT_ITEM_KEY, devid)

 Again the interface can be ioctl or the get/set xattr. If we have to use the xattr then irrespective which inode is used we would anyway store it in the dev-tree using the above key.

 This is still open for changes, the idea is to get a long lasting flexible design, so comments are welcome.

Thanks, Anand


> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
>> User provided devid list is validated against the fs_devices::dev_list.
>> 
>> For example:
>>   Usage:
>>     btrfs property set <mnt> readmirror devid<n>[,<m>...]
>>     btrfs property set <mnt> readmirror ""
>> 
>>   mkfs.btrfs -fq -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sd[b-d] && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
>>   btrfs prop set /btrfs readmirror devid1,2
>>   btrfs prop get /btrfs readmirror
>>    readmirror=devid1,2
>>   getfattr -n btrfs.readmirror --absolute-names /btrfs
>>    btrfs.readmirror="devid1,2"
>>   btrfs prop set /btrfs readmirror ""
>>   getfattr -n btrfs.readmirror --absolute-names /btrfs
>>    /btrfs: btrfs.readmirror: No such attribute
>>   btrfs prop get /btrfs readmirror
>> 
>> RFC->v1:
>>  Drops pid as one of the readmirror policy choices and as usual remains
>>  as default. And when the devid is reset the readmirror policy falls back
>>  to pid.
>>  Drops the mount -o readmirror idea, it can be added at a later point of
>>  time.
>>  Property now accepts more than 1 devid as readmirror device. As shown
>>  in the example above.
>> 
>> Anand Jain (3):
>>  btrfs: add inode pointer to prop_handler::validate()
>>  btrfs: add readmirror property framework
>>  btrfs: add readmirror devid property
>> 
>> fs/btrfs/props.c   | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> fs/btrfs/props.h   |   4 +-
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  25 +++++++++-
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.h |   8 +++
>> fs/btrfs/xattr.c   |   2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-26  8:33 [PATCH 0/3 RESEND Rebased] readmirror feature Anand Jain
2019-06-26  8:34 ` [PATCH 1/3 RESEND Rebased] btrfs: add inode pointer to prop_handler::validate() Anand Jain
2019-06-26  8:34 ` [PATCH 2/3 RESEND Rebased] btrfs: add readmirror property framework Anand Jain
2019-07-23 14:57   ` David Sterba
2019-07-24  2:42     ` Anand Jain
2019-06-26  8:34 ` [PATCH 3/3 RESEND Rebased] btrfs: add readmirror devid property Anand Jain
2019-07-23 14:55   ` David Sterba
2019-07-23 15:25     ` David Sterba
2019-06-26  8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2 RESEND Rebased] btrfs-progs: add helper to create xattr name Anand Jain
2019-06-26  8:37   ` [PATCH 2/2 RESEND Rebased] btrfs-progs: add readmirror policy Anand Jain
2019-07-23 13:53     ` David Sterba
2019-07-24  3:11       ` Anand Jain
2019-07-23 13:55     ` David Sterba
2019-07-02  8:09 ` [PATCH 0/3 RESEND Rebased] readmirror feature Anand Jain
2019-07-24  0:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-07-24  2:26   ` Anand Jain [this message]
2019-07-24  3:05     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=209E99E4-8859-47CD-8826-2493FBEA0407@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).