From: "Libor Klepáč" <libor.klepac@bcom.cz>
To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Send-recieve performance
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:15:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2282942.pRaJJzEdHC@libor-nb> (raw)
Hello,
we use backuppc to backup our hosting machines.
I have recently migrated it to btrfs, so we can use send-recieve for offsite backups of our backups.
I have several btrfs volumes, each hosts nspawn container, which runs in /system subvolume and has backuppc data in /backuppc subvolume
.
I use btrbk to do snapshots and transfer.
Local side is set to keep 5 daily snapshots, remote side to hold some history. (not much yet, i'm using it this way for few weeks).
If you know backuppc behaviour: for every backup (even incremental), it creates full directory tree of each backed up machine even if it has no modified files and places one small file in each, which holds some info for backuppc.
So after few days i ran into ENOSPACE on one volume, because my metadata grow, because of inlineing.
I switched from mdata=DUP to mdata=single (now I see it's possible to change inline file size, right?).
My problem is, that on some volumes, send-recieve is relatively fast (rate in MB/s or hundreds of kB/s) but on biggest volume (biggest in space and biggest in contained filesystem trees) rate is just 5-30kB/s.
Here is btrbk progress copyed
785MiB 47:52:00 [12.9KiB/s] [4.67KiB/s]
ie. 758MB in 48 hours.
Reciever has high IO/wait - 90-100%, when i push data using btrbk.
When I run dd over ssh it can do 50-75MB/s.
Sending machine is debian jessie with kernel 4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (upstream 4.5.3) , btrfsprogs 4.4.1. It is virtual machine running on volume exported from MD3420, 4 SAS disks in RAID10.
Recieving machine is debian jessie on Dell T20 with 4x3TB disks in MD RAID5 , kernel is 4.4.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (upstream 4.4.6), btrfsprgos 4.4.1
BTRFS volumes were created using those listed versions.
Sender:
---------
#mount | grep hosting
/dev/sdg on /mnt/btrfs/hosting type btrfs (rw,noatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
/dev/sdg on /var/lib/container/hosting type btrfs (rw,noatime,space_cache,subvolid=259,subvol=/system)
/dev/sdg on /var/lib/container/hosting/var/lib/backuppc type btrfs (rw,noatime,space_cache,subvolid=260,subvol=/backuppc)
#btrfs filesystem usage /mnt/btrfs/hosting
Overall:
Device size: 840.00GiB
Device allocated: 815.03GiB
Device unallocated: 24.97GiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 522.76GiB
Free (estimated): 283.66GiB (min: 271.18GiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 1.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
Data,single: Size:710.98GiB, Used:452.29GiB
/dev/sdg 710.98GiB
Metadata,single: Size:103.98GiB, Used:70.46GiB
/dev/sdg 103.98GiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:112.00KiB
/dev/sdg 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/sdg 24.97GiB
# btrfs filesystem show /mnt/btrfs/hosting
Label: 'BackupPC-BcomHosting' uuid: edecc92a-646a-4585-91a0-9cbb556303e9
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 522.75GiB
devid 1 size 840.00GiB used 815.03GiB path /dev/sdg
#Reciever:
#mount | grep hosting
/dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs on /mnt/btrfs/hosting type btrfs (rw,noatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
#btrfs filesystem usage /mnt/btrfs/hosting/
Overall:
Device size: 896.00GiB
Device allocated: 604.07GiB
Device unallocated: 291.93GiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 565.98GiB
Free (estimated): 313.62GiB (min: 167.65GiB)
Data ratio: 1.00
Metadata ratio: 1.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 55.80MiB)
Data,single: Size:530.01GiB, Used:508.32GiB
/dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs 530.01GiB
Metadata,single: Size:74.00GiB, Used:57.65GiB
/dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs 74.00GiB
System,DUP: Size:32.00MiB, Used:80.00KiB
/dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs 64.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs 291.93GiB
#btrfs filesystem show /mnt/btrfs/hosting/
Label: none uuid: 2d7ea471-8794-42ed-bec2-a6ad83f7b038
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 564.56GiB
devid 1 size 896.00GiB used 604.07GiB path /dev/mapper/vgPecDisk2-lvHostingBackupBtrfs
What can i do about it? I tried to defragment /backuppc subvolume (without recursive option), should i do it for all snapshots/subvolumes on both sides?
Should upgrade to 4.6.x kernel help (there is 4.6.3 in backports)?
Thanks for any answer.
With regards,
Libor
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 9:15 Libor Klepáč [this message]
2016-07-22 12:59 ` Send-recieve performance Henk Slager
2016-07-22 13:27 ` Libor Klepáč
2016-07-29 12:25 ` Libor Klepáč
2016-07-22 13:47 ` Martin Raiber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2282942.pRaJJzEdHC@libor-nb \
--to=libor.klepac@bcom.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).