From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [77.88.71.232] ([77.88.71.232]:57003 "EHLO zimbra.karlsbakk.net" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbbESRJ4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 13:09:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:09:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: Austin S Hemmelgarn Cc: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, linux-btrfs Message-ID: <229772989.47330.1432055382498.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net> In-Reply-To: <5559D3D7.4020405@gmail.com> References: <1761734734.45679.1431891207641.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net> <1042503921.46602.1431940928643.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net> <5559D3D7.4020405@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Btrfs and integration with GNU ++ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> Interesting - which ones is it that's doing this? >> > While I don't know of any that use it by _default_ yet, I do know that > it is an easy to use option on most of the big non-comercial distros > already (Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc.), and a couple (Gentoo, Arch, and > possibly Slackware) have had the option to use it since it went mainline > (although that is just a side effect of the installation procedures, not > any kind of active attempt at support). Seems CentOS 7 also allows for btrfs installs. Wonder if RHEL7 also would do that. Gotta test one day... >> I didn't run it. Some part of the Jessie startup did, and 1 minute for just >> 6x8GB (not TB) seems a lot… >> > To me, this sounds like some sort of systemd issue, I have heard of it > having issues occasionally with long delays when handling btrfs > filesystems with more than 4 devices. It wasn't just a delay - it was fsck running - it was rather verbose on this. roy