From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20445C43334 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 17:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241267AbiFIRz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 13:55:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237431AbiFIRz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 13:55:27 -0400 Received: from ts201-smtpout71.ddc.teliasonera.net (ts201-smtpout71.ddc.teliasonera.net [81.236.60.178]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C6F5FDF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 10:55:21 -0700 (PDT) X-RG-Rigid: 626BF399018904CB X-Originating-IP: [81.226.241.77] X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddtledguddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfvgffnkfetufghpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhorhgsjhpnrhhnpgflrghnshhsohhnuceothhorhgsjhhorhhnsehjrghnshhsohhnrdhtvggthheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuddtgfetueegfeeujeehffevfffhteffhedvffduffelkeevieeuteeivefhhfetnecukfhppeekuddrvddviedrvdeguddrjeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohepghgrmhhmuggrthgrnhdrhhhomhgvrdhlrghnpdhinhgvthepkedurddvvdeirddvgedurdejjedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtohhrsghjohhrnhesjhgrnhhsshhonhdrthgvtghhpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqsghtrhhfshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhsthhssegtohhlohhrrhgvmhgvughivghsrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgsohhrihhsohhvsehsuhhsvgdrtghomh X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from gammdatan.home.lan (81.226.241.77) by ts201-smtpout71.ddc.teliasonera.net (5.8.716) id 626BF399018904CB; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:55:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.9.3] (tobbe.home.lan [192.168.9.3]) by gammdatan.home.lan (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 259HtIDk428271; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:55:18 +0200 Message-ID: <22dce7de-4709-49fc-9a4f-4f3d179bd242@jansson.tech> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:55:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: btrfs-convert aborts with an assert Content-Language: en-US To: Chris Murphy Cc: Nikolay Borisov , Btrfs BTRFS References: <023b5ca9-0610-231b-fc4e-a72fe1377a5a@jansson.tech> <445c4c65-9b94-4961-c498-5c3d9b140a3d@suse.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Torbj=c3=b6rn_Jansson?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 2022-06-07 20:24, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:51 PM Torbjörn Jansson wrote: > >> Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr dir_index filetype meta_bg >> extent 64bit flex_bg casefold sparse_super large_file huge_file dir_nlink >> extra_isize metadata_csum > > ^^casefold > > I don't think this is related to the reported problem, but it occurs > to me maybe btrfs-progs should check for this feature and warn? The > feature being set means there could be behavioral expectations that > Btrfs can't currently provide since it doesn't support casefolding. > In my case i planed on using it but since, at the time, the ext4 tools for my dist did not support changing the flag properly i never started to use it. i'm not a dev and don't know all the details about this but i think at least there should not be possible to end up with duplicate filenames as a result of this.