linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Do not use data_alloc_cluster in ssd mode
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:16:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2574118e-ac4d-9788-cf8f-f633d46cfd88@mendix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170721144922.2zriwspqixh7yt3l@angband.pl>

On 07/21/2017 04:49 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> The changes in here do the following:
>>
>> 1. Throw out the current ssd_spread behaviour.
>> 2. Move the current ssd behaviour to the ssd_spread option.
>> 3. Make ssd mode data allocation identical to tetris mode, like nossd.
>> 4. Adjust and clean up filesystem mount messages so that we can easily
>> identify if a kernel has this patch applied or not, when providing
>> support to end users.
> 
>> Notes for whoever wants to backport this patch on their 4.9 LTS kernel:
>> * First apply commit 8a83665a "btrfs: drop the nossd flag when
>>   remounting with -o ssd", or fixup the differences manually.
> 
> It's 951e7966 in mainline.  I see no 8a83665a anywhere -- most likely it's
> what you got after cherry-picking to 4.9.

Yes, that's exactly where it went wrong, thanks.

-- 
Hans van Kranenburg

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-21 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-21 11:47 [PATCH] Btrfs: Do not use data_alloc_cluster in ssd mode Hans van Kranenburg
2017-07-21 14:49 ` Adam Borowski
2017-07-21 15:16   ` Hans van Kranenburg [this message]
2017-07-21 15:50 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-07-21 23:21   ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-07-24 11:23     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-07-24 14:25 ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 17:22   ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-07-24 17:52     ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 17:56       ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-07-24 18:01   ` Chris Mason
2017-07-24 18:41     ` David Sterba
2017-07-24 18:53       ` Chris Mason
2017-07-24 19:06         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-07-24 19:18           ` Chris Mason
2017-07-24 22:42         ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-07-26 13:27         ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2574118e-ac4d-9788-cf8f-f633d46cfd88@mendix.com \
    --to=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
    --cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).