From: Guido Winkelmann <guido-btrfs@thisisnotatest.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Repairing corrupted filesystems
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:55:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27281960.kxhTVsFkdY@pc10> (raw)
Hi,
I've got three servers here with corrupted btrfs filesystems. These servers
were/are part of a ceph cluster that was physically moved a few months ago.
The servers may have been incorrectly powered off without a proper shutdown
during the move, but that's hard to find out now. (It wasn't me who actually
moved them). The servers had 2 independent btrfs filesystems each (one per
physical disk).
Out of the six total filesystems, 5 can now no longer be mounted. When trying
to, I get the following messages in dmesg:
device fsid cc5ec5e4-ba19-4ce9-aecc-17e1682a63aa devid 1 transid 551383
/dev/sdb5
parent transid verify failed on 49468260352 wanted 24312 found 511537
parent transid verify failed on 49468260352 wanted 24312 found 511537
parent transid verify failed on 49468260352 wanted 24312 found 511537
parent transid verify failed on 49468260352 wanted 24312 found 511537
btrfs: open_ctree failed
In #btrfs on IRC, someone suggested I try mounting with -o recovery, but that
did not change anything.
The last time the servers had the filesystems mounted, they were running with
Kernel 3.1.1, but I have since upgraded to 3.3.5. The filesystems were
originally created with the fairly old userspace tools that were shipped with
CentOS 6.
I have tried running btrfsck from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git (checked
out yesterday), but that didn't change anything.
I also tried btrfs-recover from the same repository. That did work, however
some mails from the ceph mailing list, like this one:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ceph.devel/6219
would suggest that just recovering the files from the filesystem would not do
the trick, and I really need to actually recover the actual filesystem.
Is there something left I can do about this?
Luckily, I did not yet have any important data on the ceph cluster of which I
did not have other copies, however I'd really like to know whether btrfs can
recover from this situation at all. Frankly, 5 out of 6 filesystems not
surviving an unclean shutdown looks like a rather discouraging statistic. In
fact, this the first time I have actually witnessed /any/ filesystem actually
die from an unclean shutdown... (Yeah, I know, anecdotes != data, but
still...)
Regards,
Guido
reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27281960.kxhTVsFkdY@pc10 \
--to=guido-btrfs@thisisnotatest.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).