public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Corruption errors on Samsung 980 Pro
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:05:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2729231.WZja5ltl65@ananda> (raw)

Hello.

I migrated to a different laptop and this one has a 2TB Samsung 980 Pro drive
(not a 2TB Samsung 870 Evo Plus which previously had problems).

I thought this time I would be fine, but I just got:

[63168.287911] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63168.287925] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0
[63168.346552] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63168.346567] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 2, gen 0
[63168.346685] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63168.346708] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 3, gen 0
[63168.346859] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63168.346873] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 4, gen 0
[63299.490367] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63299.490384] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 5, gen 0
[63299.572849] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63299.572866] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 6, gen 0
[63299.573151] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63299.573168] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 7, gen 0
[63299.573286] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 2295743 off 2718461952 csum 0x48be03222606a29d expected csum 0x0100000026004000 mirror 1
[63299.573295] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 8, gen 0
[63588.902631] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 4895964 off 34850111488 csum 0x21941ce6e9739bd6 expected csum 0xc113140701000000 mirror 1
[63588.902647] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 13, gen 0
[63588.949614] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 4895964 off 34850111488 csum 0x21941ce6e9739bd6 expected csum 0xc113140701000000 mirror 1
[63588.949628] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 14, gen 0
[63588.949849] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 4895964 off 34850111488 csum 0x21941ce6e9739bd6 expected csum 0xc113140701000000 mirror 1
[63588.949855] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 15, gen 0
[63588.950087] BTRFS warning (device dm-3): csum failed root 1372 ino 4895964 off 34850111488 csum 0x21941ce6e9739bd6 expected csum 0xc113140701000000 mirror 1
[63588.950099] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bdev /dev/mapper/nvme-home errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 16, gen 0

during a backup.

According to rsync this is related (why does BTRFS does not report the
affected file?)

Create a snapshot of '/home' in '/zeit/home/backup-2021-07-16-16:40:13'
rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "/zeit/home/backup-2021-07-16-16:40:13/martin/.local/share/akonadi/search_db/email/postlist.glass": Input/output error (5)
rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "/zeit/home/backup-2021-07-16-16:40:13/martin/.local/share/akonadi/search_db/email/postlist.glass": Input/output error (5)
ERROR: martin/.local/share/akonadi/search_db/email/postlist.glass failed verification -- update discarded.
rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "/zeit/home/backup-2021-07-16-16:40:13/martin/.local/share/baloo/index": Input/output error (5)
rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "/zeit/home/backup-2021-07-16-16:40:13/martin/.local/share/baloo/index": Input/output error (5)
ERROR: martin/.local/share/baloo/index failed verification -- update discarded.

Both are frequently written to files (both Baloo and Akonadi have very crazy
I/O patterns that, I would not have thought so, can even satisfy an NVMe SSD).

I thought that a Samsung 980 Pro can easily handle "discard=async" so I
used it.

This is on a ThinkPad T14 Gen1 with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and 32 GiB of RAM.

It is BTRFS single profile on LVM on LUKS. Mount options are:

rw,relatime,lazytime,compress=zstd:3,ssd,space_cache=v2,subvolid=1054,subvol=/home

Smartctl has no errors.

I only use a few (less than 10) subvolumes.

I do not have any other errors in kernel log, so I bet this may not be
"discard=async" related. Any idea?

Could it have to do with a sudden switching off the laptop (there had
been quite some reasons cause at least with a AMD model of this laptop
in combination with an USB-C dock by Lenovo there are quite some stability
issues)? I would have hoped that the Samsung 980 Pro would still be
equipped to complete the outstanding write operation, but maybe it has
no capacitor for this.

I am really surprised by the what I experienced about the reliability of
SSDs I recently bought. I did not see a failure within a month with any
of the older SSDs. I hope this does not point at a severe worsening of
the quality. Probably I have to fit another SSD in there and use BTRFS
RAID 1 again to protect at least part of the data from errors like this.

Any idea about this? I bet you may not have any, as there is not block
I/O related errors in the log, but if you have, by all means share your
thoughts. Thank you.

Both files can be recreated. So I bet I will just remove them.

Best,
-- 
Martin



             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-16 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16 15:05 Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2021-07-16 15:19 ` Corruption errors on Samsung 980 Pro Martin Steigerwald
2021-07-17  8:31   ` Corruption errors on Samsung 980 Pro (FIXED for now) Martin Steigerwald
2021-07-18  0:16     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-20  6:56       ` Martin Steigerwald
2021-07-21 15:35         ` Dennis Zhou
2021-08-12 12:44 ` Corruption errors on Samsung 980 Pro Duncan
2021-08-13  9:50 ` Sebastian Döring
2021-08-13 18:14   ` Chris Murphy
2021-08-17 16:31     ` Martin Steigerwald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2729231.WZja5ltl65@ananda \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox