From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>, Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for dev_item
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:01:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27f44938-e58b-8566-0359-ef0260bd9b84@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220205203028.4F35.409509F4@e16-tech.com>
On 2022/2/5 20:30, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>> A btrfs filesystem failed to boot with this patch.
>>>>
>>>> corrupt leaf: root=3 block=1081344 slot=0 devid=1 invalid item
>>>> size: has 0 expect 98
>>>>
>>>> Any way to fix it online?
>>>
>>> This btrfs filesystem is created by centos 7.9 installer (btrfs
>>> 4.9?)
>>> about 1 years ago. and then mainly writen by kernel
>>> 5.4/5.10/5.15.
>>>
>> Yes, btrfs-progs v4.9 and v3.10 based kernel.
>> I created a btrfs and it looks fine.
>> Could please provide output of
>> btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree $device -t 3
>> ?
>> You can trim it if the content is too long only leaf 1081344 is needed.
>
> Hi,
>
> # btrfs filesystem show /
> Label: 'OS_T640' uuid: 73dcce98-8f6b-4ec8-bfac-fa7c7c87409d
> Total devices 10 FS bytes used 5.53TiB
> devid 1 size 799.00GiB used 332.01GiB path /dev/sda2
> devid 2 size 1.75TiB used 741.00GiB path /dev/sdg1
> devid 3 size 1.75TiB used 745.00GiB path /dev/sdj1
> devid 4 size 1.75TiB used 740.00GiB path /dev/sdi1
> devid 5 size 1.75TiB used 745.00GiB path /dev/sdd1
> devid 6 size 1.75TiB used 480.00GiB path /dev/sde1
> devid 7 size 1.75TiB used 480.00GiB path /dev/sdh1
> devid 8 size 1.75TiB used 479.00GiB path /dev/sdc1
> devid 9 size 1.75TiB used 480.00GiB path /dev/sdb1
> devid 10 size 1.75TiB used 479.00GiB path /dev/sdf1
>
> #btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree /dev/sda2 -t 3 > 3.txt
>
> and then 3.txt is zipped as this attachment file(3.zip)
Full dmesg of the boot failure please.
The dump-tree shows the device item is completely sane, it has size 98,
not the value (0) reported from tree-checker.
Thus I don't know why tree-checker is reporting this problem.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Best Regards
> Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
> 2022/02/05
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-05 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-21 9:33 [PATCH 0/2] Simple two patches for tree checker Su Yue
2022-01-21 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for inode_item Su Yue
2022-01-21 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for dev_item Su Yue
2022-02-05 3:13 ` Wang Yugui
2022-02-05 4:35 ` Wang Yugui
2022-02-05 11:15 ` Su Yue
2022-02-05 12:30 ` Wang Yugui
2022-02-05 13:01 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-02-05 14:49 ` Wang Yugui
2022-02-06 12:12 ` Su Yue
2022-02-06 15:39 ` Wang Yugui
2022-01-24 15:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] Simple two patches for tree checker David Sterba
2022-02-18 15:13 ` Su Yue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27f44938-e58b-8566-0359-ef0260bd9b84@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=l@damenly.su \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox