From: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Allow tree to be printed without an fs_info
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:33:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed59965-c7be-ca53-caca-29e2a5a96958@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180430031545.29891-2-wqu@suse.com>
On 04/30/2018 11:15 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For btrfs_print_tree() and btrfs_print_leaf(), the usage of fs_info is
> mainly for nodesize and sectorsize.
>
> However for nodesize, we can get it from @eb->len without the need for
> fs_info at all.
>
> For nodesize, introduce new helper BTRFS_NODEPTR_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER() to
> get nodesize from @eb directly.
> And with the help of previous modified btrfs_leaf_free_space(),
> btrfs_print_tree() can live without fs_info at all.
>
> For btrfs_print_leaf(), we modify print_extent_csum() to accept NULL
> fs_info by skipping csum length calculation.
>
> With all these modification, btrfs_print_tree/leaf() can be called
> without accessing @fs_info at all, and make it more flex to handle
> binary tree block dump, or inside gdb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> ctree.h | 7 +++++++
> print-tree.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
> index e291a7d48d14..80fd19612434 100644
> --- a/ctree.h
> +++ b/ctree.h
> @@ -1202,6 +1202,13 @@ static inline u32 BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(const struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
> return BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(info) / sizeof(struct btrfs_key_ptr);
> }
>
> +static inline u32
> +BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER(const struct extent_buffer *eb)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(eb->fs_info && eb->fs_info->nodesize != eb->len);
> + return __BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(eb->len) / sizeof(struct btrfs_key_ptr);
> +}
> +
> #define BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE_DATA_START \
> (offsetof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item, disk_bytenr))
> static inline u32 BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE(const struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
> index 34a724d5f7ef..31a851ef4413 100644
> --- a/print-tree.c
> +++ b/print-tree.c
> @@ -1150,6 +1150,14 @@ static void print_extent_csum(struct extent_buffer *eb,
> {
> u32 size;
>
> + /*
> + * If we don't have fs_info, only output its start position as we
> + * don't have sectorsize for the calculation
> + */
> + if (!fs_info) {
> + printf("\t\trange start %llu\n", (unsigned long long)start);
> + return;
> + }
> size = (item_size / btrfs_super_csum_size(fs_info->super_copy)) *
> fs_info->sectorsize;
> printf("\t\trange start %llu end %llu length %u\n",
> @@ -1371,7 +1379,7 @@ void btrfs_print_tree(struct extent_buffer *eb, int follow)
> printf("node %llu level %d items %d free %u generation %llu owner ",
> (unsigned long long)eb->start,
> btrfs_header_level(eb), nr,
> - (u32)BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info) - nr,
> + (u32)BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER(eb) - nr,
> (unsigned long long)btrfs_header_generation(eb));
> print_objectid(stdout, btrfs_header_owner(eb), 0);
> printf("\n");
> @@ -1385,13 +1393,16 @@ void btrfs_print_tree(struct extent_buffer *eb, int follow)
> btrfs_print_key(&disk_key);
> printf(" block %llu (%llu) gen %llu\n",
> (unsigned long long)blocknr,
> - (unsigned long long)blocknr / fs_info->nodesize,
> + (unsigned long long)blocknr / eb->len,
> (unsigned long long)btrfs_node_ptr_generation(eb, i));
> fflush(stdout);
> }
> if (!follow)
> return;
>
> + if (follow && !fs_info)
> + return;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> next = read_tree_block(fs_info,
> btrfs_node_blockptr(eb, i),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-30 3:15 [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: Remove fs_info parameter from btrfs_leaf_free_space() Qu Wenruo
2018-04-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Allow tree to be printed without an fs_info Qu Wenruo
2018-04-30 3:33 ` Su Yue [this message]
2018-04-30 3:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enhance btrfs_print_tree() check to avoid out-of-boundary memory access Qu Wenruo
2018-04-30 3:49 ` Su Yue
2018-04-30 3:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-05-09 11:57 ` David Sterba
2018-05-10 1:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-05-31 11:54 ` David Sterba
2018-04-30 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: Remove fs_info parameter from btrfs_leaf_free_space() Su Yue
2018-05-09 11:58 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ed59965-c7be-ca53-caca-29e2a5a96958@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox