From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AEC43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DDC2076F for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=libero.it header.i=@libero.it header.b="iR0XYwbV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727122AbgCXUAE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:00:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-32.italiaonline.it ([213.209.10.32]:57019 "EHLO libero.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726560AbgCXUAE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:00:04 -0400 Received: from venice.bhome ([84.220.24.82]) by smtp-32.iol.local with ESMTPA id GpiSjILgLa1lLGpiTjGnjj; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:00:01 +0100 x-libjamoibt: 1601 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=libero.it; s=s2014; t=1585080001; bh=PFHp31sdzHRXIJBIB0fxzXTkw3uVzgqeTAXJxKSUOXE=; h=From; b=iR0XYwbV7wq8UGwY5jRWdJYRsulzoX47ZlwMvAIMcjYObPKVu1/BLgMsgDdQeGNqw LRkiMVcZP2vcmEgha+i3fVSLiSuV9Yyk+dYPMWLsiOl162ImiB8275Z9hl7yq/AskU Nom/A4Uk1kPXKh3HpUGxW6s8x/k3gErcW3tPRV4z6TYGMD3A4FuJ3a0XPZ+b63lnN+ 0JLbAdH6vPMshDp5w8xpn2KjUpSKy8apaxFcHd3JaASnqq4vgXrkghimmoItDMnq32 1x8nyQgdAZrzfxACWS8FXKD4+MHv0OxSaaKytG7Ai2utQr9QJx7btlmzmJ1bdI8h+N W9XfvCGRiKflA== X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=IOJ89TnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ijacSk0KxWtIQ5WY4X6b5g==:117 a=ijacSk0KxWtIQ5WY4X6b5g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=moNAUu42ALSoEGsHl9UA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it To: David Sterba Cc: linux-btrfs From: Goffredo Baroncelli Subject: btrfs-progs: RAID1C3/C4 missing some info in btrfs_raid_array Message-ID: <2f5db5cd-001f-449d-d370-697f3494ed34@libero.it> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:00:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPsoEs3U8wZfQnz0/dkC0p8vtCgnSCrODhZJN2hoKvrJ7KVXlxTI3qlNvZqr+q3Fe9S0rJKchPZVI1fqk3Pdp8/vXX2TybMrpAyUSWQTd8qilr23dQyE Fib4goFlRyuJ9ZkXU0gy3wcfmFhSNrEaigkqiZBLvpN+xfvOJrqEDkDHlauEavjkEg40fE0J0mDSZYxebhk9i+/cFmtWNPo0CpI= Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi David, I noticed that in btrfs-progs - volumes.c in the array "btrfs_raid_array", the info raid_name and bg_flag are missing for the item BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C3 and BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C4. Is it wanted ? Which is the reason to do that ? BR G.Baroncelli -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5