From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:49528 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754145AbcGTNV2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] btrfs: divide btrfs_update_reserved_bytes() into two functions To: Wang Xiaoguang , References: <20160720055637.7275-1-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160720055637.7275-3-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> CC: , From: Josef Bacik Message-ID: <2fb41a9f-c074-f9f3-78a7-5ea5510d67db@fb.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:21:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160720055637.7275-3-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/20/2016 01:56 AM, Wang Xiaoguang wrote: > This patch divides btrfs_update_reserved_bytes() into > btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() and btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(), and > next patch will extend btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()to fix some > false ENOSPC error, please see later patch for detailed info. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang This appears to be functionally the same Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef