From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]:34940 "EHLO e23smtp09.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932661AbbI3KYi (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:24:38 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:36 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF59F2CE8052 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t8UAOE2v54919392 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:23 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t8UAO0Hu016417 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:24:00 +1000 From: Chandan Rajendra To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: jbacik@fb.com, clm@fb.com, bo.li.liu@oracle.com, dsterba@suse.cz, quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com, chandan@mykolab.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 00/13] Btrfs: Pre subpagesize-blocksize cleanups Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:53:36 +0530 Message-ID: <3010241.PlIdyOUHyB@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1443608309-30154-1-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1443608309-30154-1-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 30 Sep 2015 15:48:16 Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The patches posted along with this cover letter are cleanups made > during the developement of subpagesize-blocksize patchset. I believe > that they can be integrated with the mainline kernel. Hence I have > posted them separately from the subpagesize-blocksize patchset. > > I have testsed the patchset by running xfstests on ppc64 and > x86_64. On ppc64, some of the Btrfs specific tests and generic/255 > fail because they assume 4K as the filesystem's block size. I have > fixed some of the test cases. I will fix the rest and mail them to the > fstests mailing list in the near future. > > Changes from V3: > Two new issues have been been fixed by the patches, > 1. Btrfs: prepare_pages: Retry adding a page to the page cache. > 2. Btrfs: Return valid delalloc range when the page does not have > PG_Dirty flag set or has been invalidated. > IMHO, The above issues are also applicable to the "page size == block > size" scenario but for reasons unknown to me they aren't seen even > when the tests are run for a long time. > I accidently added the RFC tag to the patchset. Please ignore the V4 patchset. I will post the V5 without the RFC tag. -- chandan