Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 07:44:02 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31af2fa9-a484-4313-abdc-3b4fbda7c071@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503124606.GZ2585@twin.jikos.cz>



在 2024/5/3 22:16, David Sterba 写道:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:59:03AM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> The problem is as mentioned already, it's not persistent, thus it needs
>>>> a user space daemon to set it for every fs after mount.
>>>
>>> My idea of using sysfs is to export the information that the
>>> autocleaning feature is present and if we make it on by default then
>>> there's no need for additional step to enable it. The feedback about
>>> that was that it should have been default so we're going to make that
>>> change, but with sysfs export also provide a fallback to disable it in
>>> case it breaks things for somebody.
>>>
>>>> I'm totally fine to go sysfs for now, but I really hope to a persistent
>>>> solution.
>>>> Maybe a dedicated config tree?
>>>
>>> No, we already have a way to store data in the trees or in the
>>> properties so no new tree.
>>
>> That means a on-disk format change.
>> IIRC everytime we introduce a new TEMP objectid, it should at least be
>> compat or compat_ro bit change.
>>
>> Or older kernel won't understand nor follow the new TEMP key.
>
> This is not necessarily a problem, if older kernel does not understand
> the key it'll skip it. The search treats the keys as numbers. If there's
> something more associated with the additional data that would prevent
> mount then a compat bit would make sense.
>
> The compat_ro does not make sense here, the same filesystem can be
> mounted and data read or written, the only difference is that qgroups
> are also removed. How is that incompatible on the same level as other
> features like BGT?

That's why BGT is compat_ro, not compat.
And exactly why I want to push a new compat bit just for qgroup auto reap.

Thanks,
Qu


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-19  9:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] btrfs: qgroup: stale qgroups related impromvents Qu Wenruo
2024-04-19  9:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: slightly loose the requirement for qgroup removal Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 12:47   ` Boris Burkov
2024-04-29 22:00     ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 22:19       ` Boris Burkov
2024-04-29 22:29         ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 22:38           ` Boris Burkov
2024-04-19  9:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup Qu Wenruo
2024-04-24 12:41   ` David Sterba
2024-04-24 22:19     ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-25 12:34       ` David Sterba
2024-04-25 21:51         ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 13:13           ` Boris Burkov
2024-04-29 16:31             ` David Sterba
2024-04-29 22:05               ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-30 10:59                 ` David Sterba
2024-04-30 22:05                   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-30 22:18                     ` Boris Burkov
2024-04-30 22:27                       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-02 15:03                         ` David Sterba
2024-05-02 21:29                           ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-03 12:46                             ` David Sterba
2024-05-03 22:14                               ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-05-02 15:00                     ` David Sterba
2024-05-02 21:27                       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 22:49             ` Qu Wenruo
2024-04-29 16:36           ` David Sterba
2024-04-29 12:57   ` Boris Burkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31af2fa9-a484-4313-abdc-3b4fbda7c071@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox