From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: Daan De Meyer <daandemeyer@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: allow single disk devices to mount with older generations
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:58:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <333ef0d3-d026-acce-78be-ab6bac6d95a0@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b1f037344cd8d24566f3d9873b820a73384242c.1598995167.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
On 2.09.20 г. 0:19 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> We have this check to make sure we don't accidentally add older devices
> that may have disappeared and re-appeared with an older generation from
> being added to an fs_devices. This makes sense, we don't want stale
> disks in our file system. However for single disks this doesn't really
> make sense. I've seen this in testing, but I was provided a reproducer
> from a project that builds btrfs images on loopback devices. The
> loopback device gets cached with the new generation, and then if it is
> re-used to generate a new file system we'll fail to mount it because the
> new fs is "older" than what we have in cache.
>
> Fix this by simply ignoring this check if we're a single disk file
> system, as we're not going to cause problems for the fs by allowing the
> disk to be mounted with an older generation than what is in our cache.
>
> I've also added a error message for this case, as it was kind of
> annoying to find originally.
>
> Reported-by: Daan De Meyer <daandemeyer@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
Since you've got a reproducer is it possible to turn this into an fstests?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 21:19 [PATCH] btrfs: allow single disk devices to mount with older generations Josef Bacik
2020-09-02 8:58 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-09-02 10:41 ` Anand Jain
2020-09-02 17:14 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=333ef0d3-d026-acce-78be-ab6bac6d95a0@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=daandemeyer@fb.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox