From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] btrfs-progs: tests/fsck: add test case for data csum check on raid5
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:48:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33cdbaa1de3160605d0c552497bd02f9ee632f41.1649162174.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1649162174.git.wqu@suse.com>
Previously 'btrfs check --check-data-csum' will report tons of false
alerts for RAID56.
Add a test case to make sure with the new RAID56 rebuild ability, there
should be no false alerts.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
.../056-raid56-false-alerts/test.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/fsck-tests/056-raid56-false-alerts/test.sh
diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/056-raid56-false-alerts/test.sh b/tests/fsck-tests/056-raid56-false-alerts/test.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..b82e999c7740
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests/056-raid56-false-alerts/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Make sure "btrfs check --check-data-csum" won't report false alerts on RAID56
+# data.
+#
+
+source "$TEST_TOP/common"
+
+check_prereq btrfs
+check_prereq mkfs.btrfs
+check_global_prereq losetup
+
+setup_loopdevs 3
+prepare_loopdevs
+dev1=${loopdevs[1]}
+TEST_DEV=$dev1
+
+setup_root_helper
+
+run_check $SUDO_HELPERS "$TOP/mkfs.btrfs" -f -m raid1 -d raid5 ${loopdevs[@]}
+run_check_mount_test_dev
+
+run_check $SUDO_HELPER dd if=/dev/urandom of="$TEST_MNT/file" bs=16K count=1 \
+ status=noxfer > /dev/null 2>&1
+
+run_check_umount_test_dev
+
+# Check data csum should not report false alerts
+run_check "$TOP/btrfs" check --check-data-csum "$dev1"
+
+cleanup_loopdevs
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 12:48 [PATCH 0/8] btrfs-progs: add RAID56 rebuild ability at read time Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs-progs: remove the unnecessary BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET path for tree block read Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs-progs: extract metadata restore read code into its own helper Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs-progs: don't use write_extent_to_disk() directly Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs-progs: use write_data_to_disk() to replace write_extent_to_disk() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs-progs: use read_data_from_disk() to replace read_extent_from_disk() and replace read_extent_data() Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs-progs: remove extent_buffer::fd and extent_buffer::dev_bytes Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs-progs: allow read_data_from_disk() to rebuild RAID56 using P/Q Qu Wenruo
2022-04-05 12:48 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-04-08 21:16 ` [PATCH 0/8] btrfs-progs: add RAID56 rebuild ability at read time David Sterba
2022-04-11 15:01 ` David Sterba
2022-04-25 16:29 ` David Sterba
2022-04-25 22:38 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33cdbaa1de3160605d0c552497bd02f9ee632f41.1649162174.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox