From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: relocation: Only remove reloc rb_trees if reloc control has been initialized
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:31:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <341231a6-8464-d8ee-4e79-fe9066747384@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180702062538.30794-1-wqu@suse.com>
On 2.07.2018 09:25, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199833, where an
> invalid tree reloc tree can cause kernel NULL pointer dereference when
> btrfs does some cleanup for reloc roots.
>
> It turns out that fs_info->reloc_ctl can be NULL in
> btrfs_recover_relocation() as we allocate relocation control after all
> reloc roots are verified.
> So when we hit out: tag, we haven't call set_reloc_control() thus
> fs_info->reloc_ctl is still NULL.
>
> Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> index 879b76fa881a..be94c65bb4d2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> @@ -1321,18 +1321,19 @@ static void __del_reloc_root(struct btrfs_root *root)
> struct mapping_node *node = NULL;
> struct reloc_control *rc = fs_info->reloc_ctl;
> > - spin_lock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock);
> - rb_node = tree_search(&rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root,
> - root->node->start);
> - if (rb_node) {
> - node = rb_entry(rb_node, struct mapping_node, rb_node);
> - rb_erase(&node->rb_node, &rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root);
Just do if (!rc)
return;
The function is simple enough, no need to indent multiple lines.
> + if (rc) {
> + spin_lock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock);
> + rb_node = tree_search(&rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root,
> + root->node->start);
> + if (rb_node) {
> + node = rb_entry(rb_node, struct mapping_node, rb_node);
> + rb_erase(&node->rb_node, &rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock);
> + if (!node)
> + return;
> + BUG_ON((struct btrfs_root *)node->data != root);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock);
> -
> - if (!node)
> - return;
> - BUG_ON((struct btrfs_root *)node->data != root);
>
> spin_lock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
> list_del_init(&root->root_list);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 6:25 [PATCH] btrfs: relocation: Only remove reloc rb_trees if reloc control has been initialized Qu Wenruo
2018-07-02 7:31 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2018-07-02 7:53 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-02 8:01 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-02 8:05 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-07-02 8:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-07-02 15:58 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=341231a6-8464-d8ee-4e79-fe9066747384@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox