linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs Check - "type mismatch with chunk"
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:01:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3477132.ObA1D5uT4E@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$2c260$62827c72$5fe5d34$36d9b844@cox.net>

Am Dienstag, 5. Januar 2016, 15:34:35 CET schrieb Duncan:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer posted on Sat, 02 Jan 2016 06:12:46 +0100 as
> 
> excerpted:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 08:06 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> >> I wasn't personally sure if 4.1 itself was affected or not, but the
> >> wiki says don't use 4.1.1 as it's broken with this bug, with the
> >> quick-fix in 4.1.2, so I /think/ 4.1 itself is fine.  A scan with a
> >> current btrfs check should tell you for sure.  But if you meant 4.1.1
> >> and only typed 4.1, then yes, better redo.
> > 
> > What exactly was that bug in 4.1.1 mkfs and how would one notice that
> > one suffers from it?
> > I created a number of personal filesystems that I use "productively" and
> > I'm not 100% sure during which version I've created them... :/
> >
> > 
> >
> > Is there some easy way to find out, like a fs creation time stamp??
> 
> I believe a current btrfs check will flag the errors, but can't fix them, 
> as the problem was in the filesystem creation and is simply too deep to 
> fix, so the bad filesystems must be wiped and recreated with a mkfs.btrfs 
> without the bug, to fix.

btrfs check from btrfs tools 4.3.1 on kernel 4.4-rc6 has not been able to fix 
these errors and I recreated the filesystem that had the errors. I think I 
mentioned it also in this thread.

Thanks,
-- 
Martin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-24 19:15 Btrfs Check - "type mismatch with chunk" Zach Fuller
2015-12-24 21:27 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-24 23:41 ` Duncan
2015-12-25  5:28   ` covici
2015-12-25  8:06     ` Duncan
2016-01-02  5:12       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-01-05 15:34         ` Duncan
2016-01-05 18:54           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-01-05 19:01           ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2015-12-27  4:01   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2015-12-29  0:08     ` Zach Fuller
2015-12-29  4:16       ` Duncan
2015-12-29  4:42       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2016-01-02 10:48   ` Martin Steigerwald
2016-01-02 19:52     ` Henk Slager

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3477132.ObA1D5uT4E@merkaba \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).