From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] btrfs: extract the allocation and initialization of scrub_sector into a helper
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:45:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3566ee9e58a3dfd81fe71b01abda91f617f6e96f.1659936510.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1659936510.git.wqu@suse.com>
The allocation and initialization is shared by 3 call sites, and we're
going to change the initialization of some members in the upcoming
patches.
So extra the allocation and initialization of scrub_sector into a
helper, alloc_scrub_sector(), which will do the following work:
- Allocate the memory for scrub_sector
- Allocate a page for scrub_sector::page
- Initialize scrub_sector::refs to 1
- Attach the allocated scrub_sector to scrub_block
The attachment is bidirectional, which means scrub_block::sectorv[]
will be updated and scrub_sector::sblock will also be updated.
- Update scrub_block::sector_count and do extra sanity check on it
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 51d8e88a3486..d51925403eef 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -215,6 +215,33 @@ static struct scrub_block *alloc_scrub_block(struct scrub_ctx *sctx)
return sblock;
}
+/* Allocate a new scrub sector and attach it to @sblock */
+static struct scrub_sector *alloc_scrub_sector(struct scrub_block *sblock,
+ gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct scrub_sector *ssector;
+
+ ssector = kzalloc(sizeof(*ssector), gfp);
+ if (!ssector)
+ return NULL;
+ ssector->page = alloc_page(gfp);
+ if (!ssector->page) {
+ kfree(ssector);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ atomic_set(&ssector->refs, 1);
+ ssector->sblock = sblock;
+ /* This sector to be added should not be used */
+ ASSERT(sblock->sectors[sblock->sector_count] == NULL);
+ /* And the sector count should be smaller than the limit */
+ ASSERT(sblock->sector_count < SCRUB_MAX_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK);
+
+ sblock->sectors[sblock->sector_count] = ssector;
+ sblock->sector_count++;
+
+ return ssector;
+}
+
static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
struct scrub_block *sblocks_for_recheck[]);
static void scrub_recheck_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
@@ -1338,18 +1365,14 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
sblock = sblocks_for_recheck[mirror_index];
sblock->sctx = sctx;
- sector = kzalloc(sizeof(*sector), GFP_NOFS);
+ sector = alloc_scrub_sector(sblock, GFP_NOFS);
if (!sector) {
-leave_nomem:
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
scrub_put_recover(fs_info, recover);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- scrub_sector_get(sector);
- sblock->sectors[sector_index] = sector;
- sector->sblock = sblock;
sector->flags = flags;
sector->generation = generation;
sector->logical = logical;
@@ -1375,13 +1398,8 @@ static int scrub_setup_recheck_block(struct scrub_block *original_sblock,
sector->physical_for_dev_replace =
original_sblock->sectors[sector_index]->
physical_for_dev_replace;
- /* For missing devices, dev->bdev is NULL */
+ /* for missing devices, dev->bdev is NULL */
sector->mirror_num = mirror_index + 1;
- sblock->sector_count++;
- sector->page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS);
- if (!sector->page)
- goto leave_nomem;
-
scrub_get_recover(recover);
sector->recover = recover;
}
@@ -2253,19 +2271,14 @@ static int scrub_sectors(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, u64 logical, u32 len,
*/
u32 l = min(sectorsize, len);
- sector = kzalloc(sizeof(*sector), GFP_KERNEL);
+ sector = alloc_scrub_sector(sblock, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sector) {
-leave_nomem:
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
scrub_block_put(sblock);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- ASSERT(index < SCRUB_MAX_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK);
- scrub_sector_get(sector);
- sblock->sectors[index] = sector;
- sector->sblock = sblock;
sector->dev = dev;
sector->flags = flags;
sector->generation = gen;
@@ -2279,10 +2292,6 @@ static int scrub_sectors(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, u64 logical, u32 len,
} else {
sector->have_csum = 0;
}
- sblock->sector_count++;
- sector->page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!sector->page)
- goto leave_nomem;
len -= l;
logical += l;
physical += l;
@@ -2597,23 +2606,18 @@ static int scrub_sectors_for_parity(struct scrub_parity *sparity,
for (index = 0; len > 0; index++) {
struct scrub_sector *sector;
- sector = kzalloc(sizeof(*sector), GFP_KERNEL);
+ sector = alloc_scrub_sector(sblock, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sector) {
-leave_nomem:
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
sctx->stat.malloc_errors++;
spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock);
scrub_block_put(sblock);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- ASSERT(index < SCRUB_MAX_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK);
- /* For scrub block */
- scrub_sector_get(sector);
sblock->sectors[index] = sector;
/* For scrub parity */
scrub_sector_get(sector);
list_add_tail(§or->list, &sparity->sectors_list);
- sector->sblock = sblock;
sector->dev = dev;
sector->flags = flags;
sector->generation = gen;
@@ -2626,11 +2630,6 @@ static int scrub_sectors_for_parity(struct scrub_parity *sparity,
} else {
sector->have_csum = 0;
}
- sblock->sector_count++;
- sector->page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!sector->page)
- goto leave_nomem;
-
/* Iterate over the stripe range in sectorsize steps */
len -= sectorsize;
--
2.37.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-08 5:45 [PATCH v3 0/7] btrfs: scrub: changes to reduce memory usage for both regular and subpage sectorsize Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] btrfs: scrub: use pointer array to replace @sblocks_for_recheck Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] btrfs: extract the initialization of scrub_block into a helper function Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] btrfs: scrub: introduce scrub_block::pages for more efficient memory usage for subpage Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] btrfs: scrub: remove scrub_sector::page and use scrub_block::pages instead Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] btrfs: scrub: move logical/physical/dev/mirror_num from scrub_sector to scrub_block Qu Wenruo
2022-08-08 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] btrfs: use larger blocksize for data extent scrub Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3566ee9e58a3dfd81fe71b01abda91f617f6e96f.1659936510.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).