From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>, Philipp Fent <fent@in.tum.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Leaf corruption due to csum range
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:44:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36f2cb11-e87e-2eb6-56e2-19c87b061b49@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511161806.B601.409509F4@e16-tech.com>
On 2021/5/11 下午4:18, Wang Yugui wrote:
> hi,
>
> the last 'write time tree block corruption detected' is marked as
> memory ECC error.
So ECC can failed to recovery the bitflip?
Now I can't even rely on ECC memories nowadays?
(At least tree-check rocks again)
Thanks,
QU
>
> From: chil L1n <devchill1n@gmail.com>
> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:10:11 +0100
> Subject: btrfs error: write time tree block corruption detected
>
> Is this a server with ECC memory?
>
> Best Regards
> Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
> 2021/05/11
>
>> I encountered a btrfs error on my system. I run Microsoft SQL Server in
>> a docker container on a btrfs filesystem on an SSD. When bulk-loading
>> some benchmark data, my system reproducibly enters in the following
>> failing state:
>>
>> [ 366.665714] BTRFS critical (device sda): corrupt leaf:
>> root=18446744073709551610 block=507544305664 slot=0, csum end range
>> (308900515840) goes beyond the start range (308900384768) of the next
>> csum item
>> [ 366.665723] BTRFS info (device sda): leaf 507544305664 gen 18292
>> total ptrs 4 free space 3 owner 18446744073709551610
>> [ 366.665725] item 0 key (18446744073709551606 128 308891275264)
>> itemoff 7259 itemsize 9024
>> [ 366.665727] item 1 key (18446744073709551606 128 308900384768)
>> itemoff 7067 itemsize 192
>> [ 366.665728] item 2 key (18446744073709551606 128 309036716032)
>> itemoff 2587 itemsize 4480
>> [ 366.665730] item 3 key (18446744073709551606 128 309041303552)
>> itemoff 103 itemsize 2484
>> [ 366.665731] BTRFS error (device sda): block=507544305664 write time
>> tree block corruption detected
>> [ 366.665821] BTRFS: error (device sda) in btrfs_sync_log:3136:
>> errno=-5 IO failure
>> [ 366.665824] BTRFS info (device sda): forced readonly
>>
>> Please note the erroring ranges:
>> csum end: 308900515840
>> Start next: 308900384768
>> which is a difference of (1 << 17) == 0b100000000000000000 == 128KB
>> To me, this looks suspiciously like an off-by-one error, but I'm not too
>> versed in debugging btrfs.
>>
>> I reproduced this several times on my machine using the attached
>> scripts. The only obvious similarity between the crashes is this 128KB
>> csum end / start next. Sometimes a get one corrupt leaf, sometimes many.
>> I tried to reproduce it on another machine with an HDD, but didn't
>> encounter this error there.
>> Can you help me to debug this further?
>>
>> # uname -a
>> Linux desk 5.12.2-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri, 07 May 2021 15:36:06 +0000
>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> # btrfs --version
>> btrfs-progs v5.11.1
>> # btrfs fi show
>> Label: none uuid: 6733acf5-be40-4fe2-9d6f-819d39e49720
>> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 187.11GiB
>> devid 1 size 931.51GiB used 208.03GiB path /dev/sda
>> # btrfs fi df /ssdSpace
>> Data, single: total=207.00GiB, used=186.67GiB
>> System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
>> Metadata, single: total=1.00GiB, used=450.08MiB
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=215.41MiB, used=0.00B
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-10 20:50 Leaf corruption due to csum range Philipp Fent
2021-05-11 8:18 ` Wang Yugui
2021-05-11 8:44 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-05-11 8:56 ` Filipe Manana
[not found] ` <ad414944-2418-3728-ac1a-5d4d37e37ac1@in.tum.de>
2021-05-11 12:35 ` Filipe Manana
[not found] ` <ef9ea56e-fb47-f719-137b-ffb545a09db7@in.tum.de>
2021-05-13 9:57 ` Filipe Manana
2021-05-13 10:50 ` Filipe Manana
2021-05-13 11:11 ` Philipp Fent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36f2cb11-e87e-2eb6-56e2-19c87b061b49@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=fent@in.tum.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox