From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/17] btrfs: properly reset @this_bio_flag in btrfs_do_readpage() to avoid inheriting old bio flags to next extent
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:59:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <387125b0-073a-6735-9b77-bb25515c4811@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712083027.212734-2-wqu@suse.com>
On 12/07/2021 16:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> In btrfs_do_readpage(), we never reset @this_bio_flag after we hit a
> compressed extent.
>
> This is fine, as for PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize case, we can only have one
> sector for one page, thus @this_bio_flag will only be set at most once.
>
> But for subpage case, after hitting a compressed extent, @this_bio_flag
> will always have EXTENT_BIO_COMPRESSED bit, even we're reading a regular
> extent.
>
> This will lead to various read error, and causing new ASSERT() in
> incoming subpage patches, which adds more strict check in
> btrfs_submit_compressed_read().
>
> Fix it by declaring @this_bio_flag inside the main loop and reset its
> value for each iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
looks good.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 1f947e24091a..a834ba61a729 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -3487,7 +3487,6 @@ int btrfs_do_readpage(struct page *page, struct extent_map **em_cached,
> size_t pg_offset = 0;
> size_t iosize;
> size_t blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
> - unsigned long this_bio_flag = 0;
> struct extent_io_tree *tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree;
>
> ret = set_page_extent_mapped(page);
> @@ -3518,6 +3517,7 @@ int btrfs_do_readpage(struct page *page, struct extent_map **em_cached,
> }
> begin_page_read(fs_info, page);
> while (cur <= end) {
> + unsigned long this_bio_flag = 0;
> bool force_bio_submit = false;
> u64 disk_bytenr;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-16 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 8:30 [PATCH v7 00/17] btrfs: add data write support for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] btrfs: properly reset @this_bio_flag in btrfs_do_readpage() to avoid inheriting old bio flags to next extent Qu Wenruo
2021-07-16 13:59 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference when reading two compressed extent inside the same page Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] btrfs: disable compressed readahead for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] btrfs: grab correct extent map for subpage compressed extent read Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] btrfs: rework btrfs_decompress_buf2page() Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] btrfs: rework lzo_decompress_bio() to make it subpage compatible Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] btrfs: extract relocation page read and dirty part into its own function Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] btrfs: make relocate_one_page() to handle subpage case Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] btrfs: fix wild subpage writeback which does not have ordered extent Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] btrfs: disable inline extent creation for subpage Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] btrfs: allow submit_extent_page() to do bio split " Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] btrfs: reject raid5/6 fs " Qu Wenruo
2021-07-13 0:39 ` Anand Jain
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] btrfs: fix a crash caused by race between prepare_pages() and btrfs_releasepage() Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug in writeback subpage helper Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] btrfs: fix a subpage false alert for relocating partial preallocated data extents Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] btrfs: fix a subpage relocation data corruption Qu Wenruo
2021-07-12 8:30 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] btrfs: allow read-write for 4K sectorsize on 64K page size systems Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=387125b0-073a-6735-9b77-bb25515c4811@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox