Re: [PATCH] check: check so offset is not bigger then the leaf

Josef Bacik
2015-06-18T17:17:00Z

On 06/18/2015 09:44 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:59:13AM +0200, Robert Marklund wrote:
>> This could crash before because of dangerous dangling
>> offset of pointer.
>
> That's right, this can happen. There are more btrfs_item_ptr that would
> be good to validate that way, namely in the checker as it's most likely
> to see corrupted data.
>

The check_block stuff should be doing this, if it isn't that's where we
need to fix it. Thanks,

Josef