Re: Btrfs development plans

[Dmitri Nikulin <dnikulin@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
<skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:38:57 -0400
> Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> The short answer from my point of view is yes. =C2=A0This doesn't re=
ally
>> change the motivations for working on btrfs or the problems we're tr=
ying
>> to solve.
>
> ... which sounds logical to me. From looking at the project for a whi=
le one
> can see you are trying to solve problems that are not really linux' o=
nes...

Even so, I certainly hope that btrfs end up at least as reliable and
feature-complete as ZFS, if ZFS itself cannot be merged into Linux.
That's a big ask, but now that ZFS' IP has been imported into Oracle,
perhaps a lot of patent and copyright issues can be smoothed over,
giving btrfs a huge advantage relative to what it had before the
acquisition.

--=20
Dmitri Nikulin

Centre for Synchrotron Science
Monash University
Victoria 3800, Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html