From: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>,
dsterba@suse.cz, Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix extent buffer bitmap tests on big-endian systems
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:15:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c86148d-d912-9443-1815-e968ea9be13e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6dc753c434a6570251d68d4233d05e6fa84ac67.1468365157.git.osandov@fb.com>
On 2016/7/13 7:21, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>
> The in-memory bitmap code manipulates words and is therefore sensitive
> to endianness, while the extent buffer bitmap code addresses bytes and
> is byte-order agnostic. Because the byte addressing of the extent buffer
> bitmaps is equivalent to a little-endian in-memory bitmap, the extent
> buffer bitmap tests fail on big-endian systems.
>
> 34b3e6c92af1 ("Btrfs: self-tests: Fix extent buffer bitmap test fail on
> BE system") worked around another endianness bug in the tests but missed
> this one because ed9e4afdb055 ("Btrfs: self-tests: Execute page
> straddling test only when nodesize < PAGE_SIZE") disables this part of
> the test on ppc64. That change lost the original meaning of the test,
> however. We really want to test that an equivalent series of operations
> using the in-memory bitmap API and the extent buffer bitmap API produces
> equivalent results.
>
> To fix this, don't use memcmp_extent_buffer() or write_extent_buffer();
> do everything bit-by-bit.
>
> Reported-by: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> ---
> This worked for me on a QEMU-emulated MIPS system. Anatoly, could you try this
> out and let me know if this fixes your problem? Applies to v4.7-rc7.
>
> fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> index d19ab0317283..0207279a9fa9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> @@ -273,20 +273,36 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * test_bit_in_byte - Determine whether a bit is set in a byte
> - * @nr: bit number to test
> - * @addr: Address to start counting from
> - */
> -static inline int test_bit_in_byte(int nr, const u8 *addr)
> +static int check_eb_bitmap(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> + unsigned long len)
> {
> - return 1UL & (addr[nr / BITS_PER_BYTE] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_BYTE - 1)));
> + unsigned long i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len * BITS_PER_BYTE; i++) {
> + int bit, bit1;
> +
> + bit = !!test_bit(i, bitmap);
> + bit1 = !!extent_buffer_test_bit(eb, 0, i);
> + if (bit1 != bit) {
> + test_msg("Bits do not match\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + bit1 = !!extent_buffer_test_bit(eb, i / BITS_PER_BYTE,
> + i % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + if (bit1 != bit) {
> + test_msg("Offset bits do not match\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int __test_eb_bitmaps(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> unsigned long len)
> {
> - unsigned long i, x;
> + unsigned long i, j, x;
> + int ret;
>
> memset(bitmap, 0, len);
> memset_extent_buffer(eb, 0, 0, len);
> @@ -297,16 +313,18 @@ static int __test_eb_bitmaps(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
>
> bitmap_set(bitmap, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> extent_buffer_bitmap_set(eb, 0, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - if (memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, bitmap, 0, len) != 0) {
> + ret = check_eb_bitmap(bitmap, eb, len);
> + if (ret) {
> test_msg("Setting all bits failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> bitmap_clear(bitmap, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> extent_buffer_bitmap_clear(eb, 0, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - if (memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, bitmap, 0, len) != 0) {
> + ret = check_eb_bitmap(bitmap, eb, len);
> + if (ret) {
> test_msg("Clearing all bits failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* Straddling pages test */
> @@ -316,9 +334,10 @@ static int __test_eb_bitmaps(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> sizeof(long) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> extent_buffer_bitmap_set(eb, PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(long) / 2, 0,
> sizeof(long) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - if (memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, bitmap, 0, len) != 0) {
> + ret = check_eb_bitmap(bitmap, eb, len);
> + if (ret) {
> test_msg("Setting straddling pages failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> bitmap_set(bitmap, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> @@ -328,9 +347,10 @@ static int __test_eb_bitmaps(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> extent_buffer_bitmap_set(eb, 0, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> extent_buffer_bitmap_clear(eb, PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(long) / 2, 0,
> sizeof(long) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - if (memcmp_extent_buffer(eb, bitmap, 0, len) != 0) {
> + ret = check_eb_bitmap(bitmap, eb, len);
> + if (ret) {
> test_msg("Clearing straddling pages failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ret;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -339,28 +359,22 @@ static int __test_eb_bitmaps(unsigned long *bitmap, struct extent_buffer *eb,
> * something repetitive that could miss some hypothetical off-by-n bug.
> */
> x = 0;
> + bitmap_clear(bitmap, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + extent_buffer_bitmap_clear(eb, 0, 0, len * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(long); i++) {
> x = (0x19660dULL * (u64)x + 0x3c6ef35fULL) & 0xffffffffUL;
> - bitmap[i] = x;
> - }
> - write_extent_buffer(eb, bitmap, 0, len);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < len * BITS_PER_BYTE; i++) {
> - int bit, bit1;
> -
> - bit = !!test_bit_in_byte(i, (u8 *)bitmap);
> - bit1 = !!extent_buffer_test_bit(eb, 0, i);
> - if (bit1 != bit) {
> - test_msg("Testing bit pattern failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (j = 0; j < BITS_PER_LONG; j++) {
> + if (x & (1 << j)) {
> + bitmap_set(bitmap, i * sizeof(long) + j, 1);
> + extent_buffer_bitmap_set(eb, 0, i * sizeof(long) + j, 1);
> + }
> }
> + }
>
> - bit1 = !!extent_buffer_test_bit(eb, i / BITS_PER_BYTE,
> - i % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - if (bit1 != bit) {
> - test_msg("Testing bit pattern with offset failed\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + ret = check_eb_bitmap(bitmap, eb, len);
> + if (ret) {
> + test_msg("Random bit pattern failed\n");
> + return ret;
> }
>
> return 0;
Thanks for fixing the straddling pages' extent buffer bitmaps tests on
16K page big-endian system.
Also test pass on 64K page big-endian system (ppc64 BE).
Thanks
Fiona
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 23:21 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix extent buffer bitmap tests on big-endian systems Omar Sandoval
2016-07-13 13:35 ` David Sterba
2016-07-13 14:15 ` Feifei Xu [this message]
2016-07-13 15:03 ` Anatoly Pugachev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c86148d-d912-9443-1815-e968ea9be13e@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matorola@gmail.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).