From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Yan Zheng" <yanzheng@21cn.com>
Subject: Re: multiple device usage
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:35:57 +0800
Message-ID: <3d0408630812290435l7b4739dbi88b8b596df60baab@mail.gmail.com>
References: <556243856@web.de> <49559672.7060204@gmail.com>
	 <000c01c9682d$16b30da0$6602a8c0@bui.materna.com>
	 <977a2be20812280526y10eb4646i18cdc17c3af072f3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <006a01c969b1$5954fe40$6602a8c0@bui.materna.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "yanhai zhu" <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Roland <devzero@web.de>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <006a01c969b1$5954fe40$6602a8c0@bui.materna.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

2008/12/29 Roland <devzero@web.de>:
>>> so i can do btrfs-vol -r /dev/sdb while it`s being mounted, pull the disk
>>> ,
>>> replace it with a bigger one, rescan-scsi-bus, mkfs.btrfs the new disk
>>> and
>>
>>                                                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>                                               This step will fail, you
>> will
>> get a "/dev/sdb is mounted" by mkfs.btrfs, but for other slots it's ok.
>
> isn`t this sort of a design issue then?
> no way to work around this ?
>

No, this is a (easy to fix) bug.

Regards
Yan Zheng