linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:05:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fe3028d-a9de-2533-284e-dbd56b3facac@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b270f6f9-ed84-eadf-8c5b-ec813869dbca@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5096 bytes --]



On 2017年10月31日 15:41, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31.10.2017 09:35, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年10月31日 15:29, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31.10.2017 09:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31.10.2017 06:03, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>> For key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL or BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL the
>>>>> key objectid and key offset are just half of the UUID.
>>>>>
>>>>> However we just print the key as %llu, which is converted from little
>>>>> endian, not byte order for UUID, nor the traditional 36 bytes human
>>>>> readable uuid format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although true engineer can easily convert it in their brain, but to
>>>>> make it easier for search, output the result UUID using the 36 chars format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Inspired by UUID related work from Misono.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  print-tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
>>>>> index 3c585e31f1fc..687f871db302 100644
>>>>> --- a/print-tree.c
>>>>> +++ b/print-tree.c
>>>>> @@ -803,14 +803,25 @@ void btrfs_print_key(struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key)
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>> -static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, unsigned long offset,
>>>>> -			    u32 item_size)
>>>>> +static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, int slot,
>>>>> +			    unsigned long offset, u32 item_size)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> +	struct btrfs_key key;
>>>>> +	char uuid_str[BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSED_SIZE];
>>>>> +	u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Reassemble the uuid from key.objecitd and key.offset */
>>>>> +	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(l, &key, slot);
>>>>> +	put_unaligned_le64(key.objectid, uuid);
>>>>> +	put_unaligned_le64(key.offset, uuid + sizeof(u64));
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this will work on a BE system. Because
>>>> btrfs_item_key_to_cpu take the LE representation on-disk and turns it
>>>> into a cpu representation which might very well be BE. And then you
>>>> essentially reverse it by using put_unaligned_le64 for x86 it works fine
>>>> due to it being a LE system.
>>>
>>> Ok, so looking at one of your other patches and some digging seems to
>>> indicate that btrfs explicitly generates LE uuids so your code is
>>> correct, however it's not obvoious from this patch itself. I suggest to
>>> put either a comment above the put_unaligned or a statement in the
>>> commit message that uuids are always generated in little-endian format
>>
>> Or just skip the key endian converting.
>>
>> Since it's byte order to byte order, just memcpy() disk key, with proper
>> comment seems cleaner.
>>
>> BTW UUID doesn't get affected by endian. Because UUID is not a u128
>> value, but just 16 bytes, like checksum.
>> In csum case, we just use memcpy() and write_extent_buffer() without
>> doing any converting.
> 
> It does get affected, for more info you can check out commit
> f9727a17db9b ("uuid: rename uuid types").

Indeed, true UUID is not u8[16], but u32 + u16 + u16 + u16 + u48, so
it's affected by endian.

(Well, things in practice sometimes get different from its
original/formal design)

Anyway, I'll extract the key to uuid convert to btrfs_key_to_uuid(), and
add comment in that function so we don't need to bother this tricky part
any longer.

Thanks for the review,
Qu

> It seems after that little
> endian types really refer to guid as per the commit message and the the
> "one true UUID" is actually BE. Btrfs apparently chose to use little
> endian since the on-disk format uses that. Given this, I do think that
> an explicit statement that btrfs' uuids are LE is necessary.
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +	uuid_unparse(uuid, uuid_str);
>>>>> +
>>>>>  	if (item_size & (sizeof(u64) - 1)) {
>>>>>  		printf("btrfs: uuid item with illegal size %lu!\n",
>>>>>  		       (unsigned long)item_size);
>>>>>  		return;
>>>>>  	}
>>>>> +	printf("\t\tuuid %s\n", uuid_str);
>>>>>  	while (item_size) {
>>>>>  		__le64 subvol_id;
>>>>>  
>>>>> @@ -1297,7 +1308,7 @@ void btrfs_print_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb)
>>>>>  			break;
>>>>>  		case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL:
>>>>>  		case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL:
>>>>> -			print_uuid_item(eb, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>>>>> +			print_uuid_item(eb, i, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>>>>>  					btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, i));
>>>>>  			break;
>>>>>  		case BTRFS_STRING_ITEM_KEY: {
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31  4:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31  5:44 ` Misono, Tomohiro
2017-10-31  7:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  7:27   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31  7:29   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  7:35     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31  7:41       ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31  8:05         ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fe3028d-a9de-2533-284e-dbd56b3facac@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).