From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:05:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fe3028d-a9de-2533-284e-dbd56b3facac@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b270f6f9-ed84-eadf-8c5b-ec813869dbca@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5096 bytes --]
On 2017年10月31日 15:41, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 31.10.2017 09:35, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年10月31日 15:29, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31.10.2017 09:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31.10.2017 06:03, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>>> For key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL or BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL the
>>>>> key objectid and key offset are just half of the UUID.
>>>>>
>>>>> However we just print the key as %llu, which is converted from little
>>>>> endian, not byte order for UUID, nor the traditional 36 bytes human
>>>>> readable uuid format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although true engineer can easily convert it in their brain, but to
>>>>> make it easier for search, output the result UUID using the 36 chars format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Inspired by UUID related work from Misono.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> print-tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/print-tree.c b/print-tree.c
>>>>> index 3c585e31f1fc..687f871db302 100644
>>>>> --- a/print-tree.c
>>>>> +++ b/print-tree.c
>>>>> @@ -803,14 +803,25 @@ void btrfs_print_key(struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key)
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, unsigned long offset,
>>>>> - u32 item_size)
>>>>> +static void print_uuid_item(struct extent_buffer *l, int slot,
>>>>> + unsigned long offset, u32 item_size)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct btrfs_key key;
>>>>> + char uuid_str[BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSED_SIZE];
>>>>> + u8 uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Reassemble the uuid from key.objecitd and key.offset */
>>>>> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(l, &key, slot);
>>>>> + put_unaligned_le64(key.objectid, uuid);
>>>>> + put_unaligned_le64(key.offset, uuid + sizeof(u64));
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this will work on a BE system. Because
>>>> btrfs_item_key_to_cpu take the LE representation on-disk and turns it
>>>> into a cpu representation which might very well be BE. And then you
>>>> essentially reverse it by using put_unaligned_le64 for x86 it works fine
>>>> due to it being a LE system.
>>>
>>> Ok, so looking at one of your other patches and some digging seems to
>>> indicate that btrfs explicitly generates LE uuids so your code is
>>> correct, however it's not obvoious from this patch itself. I suggest to
>>> put either a comment above the put_unaligned or a statement in the
>>> commit message that uuids are always generated in little-endian format
>>
>> Or just skip the key endian converting.
>>
>> Since it's byte order to byte order, just memcpy() disk key, with proper
>> comment seems cleaner.
>>
>> BTW UUID doesn't get affected by endian. Because UUID is not a u128
>> value, but just 16 bytes, like checksum.
>> In csum case, we just use memcpy() and write_extent_buffer() without
>> doing any converting.
>
> It does get affected, for more info you can check out commit
> f9727a17db9b ("uuid: rename uuid types").
Indeed, true UUID is not u8[16], but u32 + u16 + u16 + u16 + u48, so
it's affected by endian.
(Well, things in practice sometimes get different from its
original/formal design)
Anyway, I'll extract the key to uuid convert to btrfs_key_to_uuid(), and
add comment in that function so we don't need to bother this tricky part
any longer.
Thanks for the review,
Qu
> It seems after that little
> endian types really refer to guid as per the commit message and the the
> "one true UUID" is actually BE. Btrfs apparently chose to use little
> endian since the on-disk format uses that. Given this, I do think that
> an explicit statement that btrfs' uuids are LE is necessary.
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + uuid_unparse(uuid, uuid_str);
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (item_size & (sizeof(u64) - 1)) {
>>>>> printf("btrfs: uuid item with illegal size %lu!\n",
>>>>> (unsigned long)item_size);
>>>>> return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + printf("\t\tuuid %s\n", uuid_str);
>>>>> while (item_size) {
>>>>> __le64 subvol_id;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1297,7 +1308,7 @@ void btrfs_print_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb)
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_SUBVOL:
>>>>> case BTRFS_UUID_KEY_RECEIVED_SUBVOL:
>>>>> - print_uuid_item(eb, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>>>>> + print_uuid_item(eb, i, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, i),
>>>>> btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, i));
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case BTRFS_STRING_ITEM_KEY: {
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 4:03 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enehance uuid item print Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31 5:44 ` Misono, Tomohiro
2017-10-31 7:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 7:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31 7:29 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 7:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-10-31 7:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-10-31 8:05 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3fe3028d-a9de-2533-284e-dbd56b3facac@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).