linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
To: Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com>,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remount and conflicting ssd options?
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 20:20:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4096c717-4804-bce4-d7da-de962218f190@mendix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtTU6M1c-B1thYtTBidyEpM9AWPMSPU=NGxj3QHnqTM7+A@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/15/2017 08:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I don't understand this:
> 
> /dev/mmcblk0p3 on / type btrfs
> (rw,noatime,seclabel,compress=zlib,nossd,ssd_spread,space_cache,commit=150,subvolid=260,subvol=/root)
> 
> 
> The fstab uses ssd_spread. It looks like during startup the initial
> option is ssd via autodetection and then at switchroot time, when it
> goes ro to rw, the fstab options are applied and it becomes
> ssd_spread. Fine.
> 
> Then later I tried
> 
> mount -o remount,ssd
> 
> To go back to regular ssd option, but nothing happens, mount still
> shows ssd_spread. And then if I do
> 
> mount -o remount,nossd
> 
> I get the above mount output with nossd,ssd_spread options which would
> seem to be a contradiction. At least it's confusing. So... now what?
> 
> kernel 4.10.8-200.fc25.x86_64
> 

See thread "Cosmetics bug: remounting ssd does not clear nossd", started
on Mar 31. It has all the answers. :-)

-- 
Hans van Kranenburg

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-15 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-15 18:17 remount and conflicting ssd options? Chris Murphy
2017-04-15 18:20 ` Hans van Kranenburg [this message]
2017-04-15 18:31 ` Adam Borowski
2017-04-15 18:41   ` Chris Murphy
2017-04-15 18:50     ` Adam Borowski
2017-04-15 20:35       ` Chris Murphy
2017-04-16  0:41         ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-04-16 18:03           ` Chris Murphy
2017-04-15 18:57     ` Hans van Kranenburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4096c717-4804-bce4-d7da-de962218f190@mendix.com \
    --to=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
    --cc=chris@colorremedies.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).