[PATCH 3/5] btrfs: defrag: make readahead state allocation failure non-fatal

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>]

All sorts of readahead errors are not considered fatal. We can continue
defragmentation without it, with some potential slow down, which will
last only for the current inode.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index d260c4c57338..f418d29b0b92 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1304,14 +1304,14 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 		extent_thresh = SZ_256K;
 
 	/*
-	 * if we were not given a file, allocate a readahead
-	 * context
+	 * If we were not given a file, allocate a readahead context. As
+	 * readahead is just an optimization, defrag will work without it so
+	 * we don't error out.
 	 */
 	if (!file) {
 		ra = kzalloc(sizeof(*ra), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!ra)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		file_ra_state_init(ra, inode->i_mapping);
+		if (ra)
+			file_ra_state_init(ra, inode->i_mapping);
 	} else {
 		ra = &file->f_ra;
 	}
@@ -1394,8 +1394,9 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 
 		if (i + cluster > ra_index) {
 			ra_index = max(i, ra_index);
-			btrfs_force_ra(inode->i_mapping, ra, file, ra_index,
-				       cluster);
+			if (ra)
+				btrfs_force_ra(inode->i_mapping, ra, file,
+						ra_index, cluster);
 			ra_index += cluster;
 		}
 
-- 
2.13.0