From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from walhalla.sjomar.eu ([141.105.125.198]:33301 "EHLO mail.sjomar.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbbIXVMy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:12:54 -0400 Received: from hoefnix.localnet (a83-163-227-207.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.163.227.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sjoerd@sjomar.eu) by mail.sjomar.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 368F2298D4 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:07:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Sjoerd To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Latest kernel to use? Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:07:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4362384.AA8xu4anSN@hoefnix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Maybe a silly question for most of you, but the wiki states to always try to use the latest kernel with btrfs. Which one would be best: - 4.2.1 (currently latest stable and matches the btrfs-progs versioning) or - the 4.3.x (mainline)? Stable sounds more stable to me(hence the name ;) ), but the mainline kernel seems to be in more active development? Cheers, Sjoerd